Suppr超能文献

双标记水法、摄入量平衡法以及直接和间接量热法在成年男性能量消耗测量中的比较

Comparison of doubly labeled water, intake-balance, and direct- and indirect-calorimetry methods for measuring energy expenditure in adult men.

作者信息

Seale J L, Rumpler W V, Conway J M, Miles C W

机构信息

US Department of Agriculture, Energy and Protein Nutrition Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705.

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jul;52(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/52.1.66.

Abstract

Energy expenditure (EE) of four adult men on a weight-maintenance diet was estimated by use of doubly labeled water, intake balance, and direct and indirect calorimetry. The doubly labeled water (2H218O) method was used to estimate free-living EE for 13 d. Metabolizable energy (ME) intake was used to estimate free-living EE for 1 wk. The subjects' 24-h EE was measured in a dual direct-indirect room calorimeter on 3 alternate days. Estimates of free-living EE as measured by ME intake and doubly labeled water indicate agreement between the two methods (mean difference +/- SEM, -1.04 +/- 0.63%). Measurements of EE with indirect and direct calorimetry are equivalent (mean difference 0.63 +/- 0.44%). The daily EE measured by doubly labeled water in these free-living adults over a 13-d period was 15.01% greater than the 24-h EE measured within the calorimeter.

摘要

通过使用双标记水、摄入量平衡以及直接和间接量热法,对四名体重维持饮食的成年男性的能量消耗(EE)进行了估算。双标记水(2H218O)法用于估算13天的自由生活能量消耗。可代谢能量(ME)摄入量用于估算1周的自由生活能量消耗。在3个交替日,在双直接-间接房间量热计中测量受试者的24小时能量消耗。通过ME摄入量和双标记水测量的自由生活能量消耗估算表明两种方法之间具有一致性(平均差异±标准误,-1.04±0.63%)。间接和直接量热法测量的能量消耗是等效的(平均差异0.63±0.44%)。在13天期间,这些自由生活的成年人通过双标记水测量的每日能量消耗比在量热计中测量的24小时能量消耗高15.01%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验