Laurenson Helen, Swartz Sally
Child Guidance Clinic, Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Hist Psychol. 2011 Aug;14(3):249-63. doi: 10.1037/a0024543.
When the National Party came to power in South Africa in 1948 it inherited an ageing colonial psychiatric system underpinned by British-based mental health legislation promulgated in 1916. This situation remained substantially unchanged until the late 1960s, despite the apartheid government's far-reaching attempts to restructure other aspects of the social landscape. The 1966 assassination of South Africa's prime minister by a schizophrenic parliamentary messenger led directly to a series of commissions of enquiry into the management of mental health services, followed by new mental health legislation in 1973 and the compulsory registration of clinical psychologists. The increasing professionalization of psychology, and the apartheid state's policy in relation to the profession, are considered in the light of local and international influences. Unlike the Nazi and Soviet governments, the apartheid state did not seek to create a new psychology and psychiatry in its own image but was instead motivated by a desire to emulate Western models and to identify and control the dangerous individual.
1948年南非国民党上台执政时,继承了一个陈旧的殖民精神病学体系,该体系以1916年颁布的英国心理健康立法为基础。尽管种族隔离政府在社会格局的其他方面进行了大刀阔斧的改革尝试,但这种情况直到20世纪60年代末基本没有改变。1966年,一名精神分裂症患者刺杀了南非总理,这直接导致了一系列对心理健康服务管理的调查委员会的成立,随后在1973年出台了新的心理健康立法,并对临床心理学家进行强制注册。本文从本地和国际影响的角度,探讨了心理学日益专业化以及种族隔离政权对该专业的政策。与纳粹和苏联政府不同,种族隔离政权并未试图按照自己的形象创建新的心理学和精神病学,而是受到效仿西方模式以及识别和控制危险个体的愿望的驱使。