Wu Bing, Sun JiayU, Wang Chenglong, Xia Chuncao, Li Changxian
Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;28(4):670-5.
This study was aimed to compare and evaluate the diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography (NCE-MRA) with contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) in the anatomic assessment of hepatic portal vein. Thirty people, ten patients with hepatic cirrhosis without ascites and twenty normal physical examination donors as control group were included in the NCE-MRA and CE-MRA with the same 1.5T MR scanner. Anatomic angiographic images were reconstructed and their datasets available for analysis independently performed by two radiologists. Assessment of data quality of hepatic portal vein vessels was rated with a four-point scale. After consensus reading, a total 27 images (90%) scored more than 3 point were observed in NCE-MRA and 28 (93.3%) in CE-MRA, respectively. Segmental branch vessels were visualized on MR angiography in the majority of cases. Both NCE-MRA and CE-MRA correctly characterized the hepatic portal veins with grade 5 and without false positive cases. Only 4 false negatives with grade 6 were missed in NCE-MRA group. There were no statistically significant differences between NCE-MRA and CE-MRA for characterization of hepatic vasculature (P < 0.05). Kappa value was larger than 0.75 for both reviewers. A conclusion could be drawn that NCE-MRA is a non-invasive and effective method that provides a comprehensive assessment of the hepatic portal vein.
本研究旨在比较和评估非增强磁共振血管造影(NCE-MRA)与增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)在肝门静脉解剖评估中的诊断性能。30人纳入NCE-MRA和CE-MRA研究,其中10例无腹水的肝硬化患者,20例正常体检者作为对照组,均使用同一台1.5T磁共振扫描仪。由两名放射科医生独立重建解剖血管造影图像并分析其数据集。采用四分制对肝门静脉血管的数据质量进行评估。经过一致性阅片后,NCE-MRA组共观察到27幅图像(90%)评分超过3分,CE-MRA组为28幅(93.3%)。在大多数病例中,磁共振血管造影可显示节段分支血管。NCE-MRA和CE-MRA均正确识别了5级肝门静脉,且无假阳性病例。NCE-MRA组仅漏诊4例6级假阴性病例。NCE-MRA和CE-MRA在肝血管系统特征描述方面无统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。两位阅片者的Kappa值均大于0.75。可以得出结论,NCE-MRA是一种无创且有效的方法,可对肝门静脉进行全面评估。