Suppr超能文献

产自坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷的能人化石上的鳄形目和哺乳类食肉动物的食迹。FLK 22 和 FLK NN 3,上新世-更新世。

Crocodylian and mammalian carnivore feeding traces on hominid fossils from FLK 22 and FLK NN 3, Plio-Pleistocene, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.

机构信息

Human Evolution Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2012 Aug;63(2):408-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Sep 19.

Abstract

Taphonomic analysis of the Olduvai Hominid (OH) 8 left foot from FLK NN Level 3 and the OH 35 left leg from FLK Level 22 (Zinjanthropus level) in Middle Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, indicates that both were fed upon by crocodiles. Both bear extensive tooth marking, including bisected tooth marks diagnostic of crocodylian feeding. The location of the bisected tooth marks on the distal tibia and the talus indicates disarticulation of the foot by crocodiles. The broken proximal ends of the tibia and fibula are more typical of feeding by a leopard-like carnivore, as is damage to the OH 7 mandible and parietals that are associated with and may derive from the same individual as OH 8. Previous work showing a close articulation of the foot and the leg has been used to suggest that the two specimens belong to the same individual despite deriving from sites separated by 200 m and slightly different stratigraphic levels according to previous work. The location and agent of tooth marking and the nature of gross damage do not refute this hypothesis, but the punctures on the talus and distal tibia differ in size and sharpness. Recent work shows that the stratigraphic discrepancy between OH 8 and OH 35 is greater than previously thought, refuting the single-individual hypothesis. Although seemingly unlikely, this denotes that two hominids represented by rarely found leg and foot elements both lost their left foot to crocodiles at nearby sites within a 6,000 year interval. We cannot determine if the hominids were preyed upon by crocodiles or mammalian carnivores. However, the carnivore damage to them and associated faunal remains suggests that high predation risk constrained hominid activities involving discard of the stone artifacts found at these sites. This finding is inconsistent with the interpretation of the sites as home bases or living floors.

摘要

奥杜威古人类(OH)8 号左脚来自 FLK NN 第 3 层,OH35 号左腿来自 FLK 第 22 层(直立人层),位于奥杜威峡谷 I 号中层,表明这两具骨骼都曾被鳄鱼啃食过。两者都有广泛的牙齿痕迹,包括可诊断为鳄类进食的二分牙痕。在胫骨远端和距骨上的二分牙痕的位置表明,脚部是被鳄鱼撕开的。胫骨和腓骨的近端断裂更典型于被豹形肉食动物进食,就像 OH7 号下颌骨和顶骨所受到的损伤一样,这些损伤与 OH8 号可能来自同一个体,并且可能源于同一个体。先前的研究表明,脚部和腿部的紧密关节被用来表明,尽管这两个标本来自相距 200 米且根据先前的研究略微处于不同地层的地点,但它们属于同一个个体。牙齿痕迹的位置和来源以及大体损伤的性质并没有反驳这一假设,但距骨和胫骨远端的穿刺在大小和锋利度上有所不同。最近的研究表明,OH8 号和 OH35 号之间的地层差异比之前认为的要大,从而反驳了单一个体的假设。尽管这似乎不太可能,但这意味着在 6000 年的时间间隔内,两个代表很少发现的腿部和脚部元素的古人类都在附近的地点失去了他们的左脚,都被鳄鱼捕食了。我们无法确定古人类是被鳄鱼还是哺乳动物捕食者捕食的。然而,对它们和相关动物遗骸的捕食者损伤表明,高捕食风险限制了古人类的活动,包括丢弃在这些地点发现的石器。这一发现与将这些地点解释为家基地或生活层的解释不一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验