Capaldo S D
Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA.
J Hum Evol. 1997 Nov;33(5):555-97. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0150.
Published and unpublished skeletal and surface mark data from the large, well-preserved, bovid dominated FLK 22 (Zinjanthropus) archaeofauna are analyzed using data derived from four different experimental control samples. The control samples are realistic because they are based on natural history and paleoecological data collected from FLK 22, and other Olduvai Gorge assemblages; they are precise because independent experimental studies following the same methods have generated the same results; and they restore generality to the study of site formation because each one models a different hominid and/or carnivore scenario of site formation. Comparability between FLK 22 and the control samples is established by excluding specimens from the former which do not meet identification and reporting standards derived from the latter. As in two previous studies, a comprehensive analysis of tooth marks and tool marks on long bone specimens from FLK 22 indicates that they were processed in three stages. In stage one, carnivores defleshed long bones, as inferred from the high percentage of tooth marks on midshaft fragments. In stage two, hominids processed intact long bones for marrow, as inferred from percussion mark percentages. Cut marks suggest that long bones retained flesh, but the amount, as yet, cannot be determined using cut mark percentages. In stage three, carnivores processed long bone epiphyses for grease, as inferred from the under-representation of long bone epiphyses and the high percentage of tooth marks on near-epiphyses and surviving epiphyses. The lack of comprehensive skeletal and surface mark data on cranial, axial, compact, and other specimens currently limits the application of experimental results. However, the available data suggest that the condition and representation of these items in the FLK 22 assemblage are also consistent with a carnivore to hominid to carnivore sequence of site formation. The variety of elements present, and their extensive processing by hominids, indicates that FLK 22 functioned as a central place/refuge where hominids could transport a variety of carcass parts and process them in an unhurried fashion. The presence of numerous small and medium sized individuals also indicates that hominids could have passively scavenged carcasses from a number of different sources including lions, leopards, sabertooth cats, and mass drownings.
利用从四个不同实验对照样本中获取的数据,对保存完好、以牛科动物为主的FLK 22(东非古猿)考古动物群已发表和未发表的骨骼及表面痕迹数据进行了分析。这些对照样本是符合实际情况的,因为它们基于从FLK 22以及其他奥杜威峡谷动物群收集的自然历史和古生态数据;它们是精确的,因为采用相同方法进行的独立实验研究得出了相同的结果;而且它们使遗址形成研究具有普遍性,因为每个样本都模拟了不同的人类和/或食肉动物造成遗址形成的情况。通过排除FLK 22中不符合源自对照样本的鉴定和报告标准的标本,确立了FLK 22与对照样本之间的可比性。正如之前的两项研究一样,对FLK 22长骨标本上的牙痕和工具痕迹进行的综合分析表明,它们经历了三个处理阶段。在第一阶段,从骨干中段碎片上牙痕的高比例可以推断,食肉动物剥去了长骨的肉。在第二阶段,从敲击痕迹的百分比可以推断,人类处理完整的长骨以获取骨髓。切割痕迹表明长骨上还留有肉,但目前还无法用切割痕迹的百分比来确定肉的数量。在第三阶段,从长骨骨骺的代表性不足以及近骨骺和留存骨骺上牙痕的高比例可以推断,食肉动物处理长骨骨骺以获取油脂。目前,关于颅骨、轴骨、致密骨和其他标本缺乏全面的骨骼及表面痕迹数据,这限制了实验结果的应用。然而,现有数据表明,FLK 22动物群中这些物品的状况和代表性也与食肉动物到人类再到食肉动物的遗址形成顺序相一致。所存在的元素种类以及人类对它们的广泛处理表明,FLK 22起到了一个中心地点/避难所的作用,人类可以在这里搬运各种尸体部位并从容地进行处理。大量中小型个体的存在也表明,人类可能被动地从包括狮子、豹子、剑齿虎和大规模溺水事件等多种不同来源获取尸体。