Suppr超能文献

多中心随机 III 期试验:长春瑞滨/吉西他滨双联方案对比卡培他滨单药治疗蒽环类和紫杉类药物预处理的转移性乳腺癌女性患者。

A multicenter randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet versus capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer.

机构信息

Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece.

Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2012 May;23(5):1164-1169. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr405. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Breast Cancer Study Group of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group conducted a phase III trial of single-agent capecitabine versus the vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of combination treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with MBC were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine (Cap arm: 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, on days 1-14) or vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet (VG arm: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2); both drugs on days 1 and 15).

RESULTS

Seventy-four women were treated on each arm and median PFS was 5.4 versus 5.2 months (P = 0.736), for VG and Cap, respectively. Median overall survival was 20.4 months for the VG arm and 22.4 months for the Cap arm (P = 0.319). Overall response rate was 28.4% in the VG arm and 24.3% in the Cap arm (P = 0.576). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Neutropenia and fatigue were more common with VG arm and hand-foot syndrome with Cap arm.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial failed to demonstrate superiority of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet over single-agent capecitabine in terms of PFS. Given the favorable toxicity and convenience of oral administration, single-agent capecitabine is recommended for compliant patients.

摘要

背景

希腊肿瘤研究组乳腺癌研究小组进行了一项 III 期试验,比较了转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者中卡培他滨单药治疗与长春瑞滨/吉西他滨联合治疗的疗效,这些患者在接受蒽环类药物和紫杉烷类药物治疗后。主要目的是证明联合治疗在无进展生存期(PFS)方面的优越性。

患者和方法

MBC 女性患者被随机分配接受卡培他滨(Cap 组:1250 mg/m2,每日 2 次,第 1-14 天)或长春瑞滨/吉西他滨联合治疗(VG 组:长春瑞滨 25 mg/m2;吉西他滨 1000 mg/m2;均在第 1 天和第 15 天给药)。

结果

每个治疗组均有 74 例患者接受治疗,VG 组和 Cap 组的中位 PFS 分别为 5.4 个月和 5.2 个月(P=0.736)。VG 组的中位总生存期为 20.4 个月,Cap 组为 22.4 个月(P=0.319)。VG 组的总缓解率为 28.4%,Cap 组为 24.3%(P=0.576)。两种方案均具有良好的耐受性。VG 组常见中性粒细胞减少和疲劳,Cap 组常见手足综合征。

结论

本试验未能证明长春瑞滨/吉西他滨联合治疗在 PFS 方面优于单药卡培他滨。鉴于卡培他滨具有良好的毒性和口服给药的便利性,建议对依从性好的患者使用单药卡培他滨。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验