Suppr超能文献

网络荟萃分析:在局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌中,艾立布林与其他二线或后线化疗药物的比较。

Network meta-analysis of eribulin versus other chemotherapies used as second- or later-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

机构信息

Global Value & Access, Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.

Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08446-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eribulin mesylate (ERI; Halaven®) is a microtubule inhibitor approved in the United States for metastatic breast cancer patients with at least two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer, and in the European Union in locally advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer patients who progressed after at least one chemotherapy for advanced disease. This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ERI versus other chemotherapies in this setting.

METHODS

Systematic searches conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials identified randomized controlled trials of locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer chemotherapies in second- or later-line settings. Efficacy assessment included pre-specified subgroup analysis of breast cancer subtypes. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis estimated primary outcomes of overall survival and progression-free survival using fixed-effect models. Comparators included: capecitabine (CAP), gemcitabine (GEM), ixabepilone (IXA), utidelone (UTI), treatment by physician's choice (TPC), and vinorelbine (VIN).

RESULTS

The network meta-analysis included seven trials. Results showed that second- or later-line patients treated with ERI had statistically longer overall survival versus TPC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; credible interval [CrI]: 0.66-0.99) or GEM+VIN (0.62; 0.42-0.90) and statistically longer progression-free survival versus TPC (0.76; 0.64-0.90), but statistically shorter progression-free survival versus CAP+IXA (1.40; 1.17-1.67) and CAP+UTI (1.61; 1.23-2.12). In triple negative breast cancer, ERI had statistically longer overall survival versus CAP (0.70; 0.54-0.90); no statistical differences in progression-free survival were observed in triple negative breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis suggests that ERI may provide an overall survival benefit in the overall locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer populations and triple negative breast cancer subgroup compared to standard treatments. These findings support the use of ERI in second- or later-line treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer.

摘要

背景

盐酸伊立替康(ERI;Halaven®)是一种微管抑制剂,已获美国批准用于转移性乳腺癌患者,这些患者至少接受过两种转移性乳腺癌的化疗方案治疗,在欧盟则用于局部晚期乳腺癌或转移性乳腺癌患者,这些患者在接受至少一种晚期疾病化疗后病情进展。本网络荟萃分析比较了 ERI 与该治疗环境下其他化疗药物的疗效和安全性。

方法

在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 临床试验中心注册库中进行系统检索,以确定局部晚期乳腺癌/转移性乳腺癌二线或以后线化疗的随机对照试验。疗效评估包括对乳腺癌亚型的预先指定亚组分析。使用循证医学中心的工具评估纳入研究的质量。贝叶斯网络荟萃分析使用固定效应模型估计总生存期和无进展生存期的主要结局。对照药物包括卡培他滨(CAP)、吉西他滨(GEM)、伊沙匹隆(IXA)、乌替洛尔(UTI)、医生选择的治疗(TPC)和长春瑞滨(VIN)。

结果

该网络荟萃分析纳入了 7 项试验。结果显示,与 TPC 相比,接受 ERI 二线或以后线治疗的患者的总生存期具有统计学意义上的延长(风险比 [HR]:0.81;可信区间 [CrI]:0.66-0.99)或 GEM+VIN(0.62;0.42-0.90),与 TPC 相比,无进展生存期具有统计学意义上的延长(0.76;0.64-0.90),但与 CAP+IXA(1.40;1.17-1.67)和 CAP+UTI(1.61;1.23-2.12)相比,无进展生存期较短。在三阴性乳腺癌中,与 CAP 相比,ERI 具有统计学意义上的总生存期延长(0.70;0.54-0.90);在三阴性乳腺癌中,无进展生存期无统计学差异。

结论

本网络荟萃分析表明,与标准治疗相比,在总体局部晚期乳腺癌/转移性乳腺癌人群和三阴性乳腺癌亚组中,ERI 可能提供总生存期获益。这些发现支持在局部晚期乳腺癌/转移性乳腺癌二线或以后线治疗中使用 ERI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f837/8244131/ed58bfe0745c/12885_2021_8446_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验