Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S.Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Pain Med. 2012 Feb;13(2):263-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01241.x. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
We evaluated whether outpatient intravenous ketamine infusions were satisfactory for pain relief in patients suffering from various chronic intractable pain syndromes.
Retrospective chart review.
Following Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively analyzed our database for all ketamine infusions administered over 5 years from 2004 to 2009.
Data reviewed included doses of intravenous ketamine, infusion duration, pain scores on visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and post-procedure, long-term pain relief, previous interventions, and side effects. All patients were pretreated with midazolam and ondansetron.
We identified 49 patients undergoing 369 outpatient ketamine infusions through retrospective analysis. We excluded 36 infusions because of missing data. Among our patients, 18 (37%) had a diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Of the remaining 31 (63%) patients, eight had refractory headaches and seven had severe back pain. All patients reported significant reduction in VAS score of 5.9 (standard error [SE] 0.35). For patients with CRPS, reduction in VAS score was 7.2 (SE 0.51, P < 0.001); for the others, the reduction was 5.1 (SE 0.40, P < 0.001). The difference of 2.1 between groups was statistically significant (SE 0.64, P = 0.002). In 29 patients, we recorded the duration of pain relief. Using the Bernoulli model, we found (90% confidence interval) that the probability of lasting pain relief in patients with refractory pain states was 59-85% (23-51% relief over 3 weeks).
We conclude that in patients with severe refractory pain of multiple etiologies, subanesthetic ketamine infusions may improve VAS scores. In half of our patients, relief lasted for up to 3 weeks with minimal side effects.
评估门诊静脉滴注氯胺酮治疗各种慢性难治性疼痛综合征患者的疼痛缓解效果。
回顾性病历分析。
在机构审查委员会批准后,我们回顾性地分析了 2004 年至 2009 年 5 年间我们数据库中所有氯胺酮输注的情况。
包括静脉内氯胺酮剂量、输注时间、治疗前后视觉模拟评分(VAS)的疼痛评分、长期疼痛缓解、先前的干预措施和副作用。所有患者均预先使用咪达唑仑和昂丹司琼。
通过回顾性分析,我们确定了 49 名接受 369 次门诊氯胺酮输注的患者。由于数据缺失,我们排除了 36 次输注。在我们的患者中,18 例(37%)患有复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)。其余 31 例(63%)患者中,8 例患有难治性头痛,7 例患有严重背痛。所有患者的 VAS 评分均显著降低,平均降低 5.9(标准误差[SE]0.35)。对于 CRPS 患者,VAS 评分降低 7.2(SE0.51,P<0.001);对于其他患者,VAS 评分降低 5.1(SE0.40,P<0.001)。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(SE0.64,P=0.002)。在 29 名患者中,我们记录了疼痛缓解的持续时间。使用伯努利模型,我们发现(90%置信区间),难治性疼痛状态患者持续缓解疼痛的概率为 59-85%(3 周内缓解 23-51%)。
我们得出结论,对于多种病因引起的严重难治性疼痛患者,亚麻醉剂量的氯胺酮输注可能会改善 VAS 评分。在我们的一半患者中,缓解持续时间长达 3 周,副作用最小。