Hirsbrunner H P, Fankhauser F, Funkhouser A T, Jenni A
University Eye Clinic, Bern, Switzerland.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1990;34(1):72-80.
The complexity of visual field result evaluation has increased with the advent of automated perimetry. This in turn makes software assistance such as provided by the new Octosmart program interesting and desirable. Its accuracy and reliability in visual field evaluation must be tested, though, and the testing methodology itself must be developed. For this purpose, 27 visual fields were evaluated by three human interpreters and the Octosmart program. Based on a newly developed compound index, the performance of the three interpreters and Octosmart is described and a high degree of consistency is demonstrated.
随着自动视野计的出现，视野结果评估的复杂性增加了。这反过来使得像新的Octosmart程序提供的软件辅助变得有趣且令人期待。不过，其在视野评估中的准确性和可靠性必须经过测试，并且测试方法本身也必须得以开发。为此，由三名人工解读员和Octosmart程序对27个视野进行了评估。基于新开发的复合指数，描述了三名解读员和Octosmart的表现，并证明了高度的一致性。
