• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们如何看待艺术:一项眼动追踪研究。

How do we see art: an eye-tracker study.

机构信息

Department of Engineering, University of Leicester Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Sep 12;5:98. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00098. eCollection 2011.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00098
PMID:21941476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170918/
Abstract

We describe the pattern of fixations of subjects looking at figurative and abstract paintings from different artists (Molina, Mondrian, Rembrandt, della Francesca) and at modified versions in which different aspects of these art pieces were altered with simple digital manipulations. We show that the fixations of the subjects followed some general common principles (e.g., being attracted to saliency regions) but with a large variability for the figurative paintings, according to the subject's personal appreciation and knowledge. In particular, we found different gazing patterns depending on whether the subject saw the original or the modified version of the painting first. We conclude that the study of gazing patterns obtained by using the eye-tracker technology gives a useful approach to quantify how subjects observe art.

摘要

我们描述了受试者观看不同艺术家(莫利纳、蒙德里安、伦勃朗、德拉·弗朗西斯卡)的具象画和抽象画以及经过简单数字处理后改变了这些艺术作品某些方面的修改版本时的注视模式。我们表明,受试者的注视遵循一些一般的共同原则(例如,被显著区域吸引),但对于具象画则存在很大的可变性,这取决于受试者的个人喜好和知识。特别是,我们发现了不同的注视模式,这取决于受试者是先看到原始版本还是修改后的版本。我们得出结论,使用眼动追踪技术研究注视模式为量化受试者观察艺术的方式提供了一种有用的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/2afc00a575b2/fnhum-05-00098-a005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/09647941b046/fnhum-05-00098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/57e906132e37/fnhum-05-00098-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/731b7bc2b146/fnhum-05-00098-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/65b99e8dd80d/fnhum-05-00098-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/4927529d4784/fnhum-05-00098-a001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/2c3c87363a28/fnhum-05-00098-a002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/0a7974d40aaf/fnhum-05-00098-a003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/52c928b14252/fnhum-05-00098-a004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/2afc00a575b2/fnhum-05-00098-a005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/09647941b046/fnhum-05-00098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/57e906132e37/fnhum-05-00098-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/731b7bc2b146/fnhum-05-00098-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/65b99e8dd80d/fnhum-05-00098-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/4927529d4784/fnhum-05-00098-a001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/2c3c87363a28/fnhum-05-00098-a002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/0a7974d40aaf/fnhum-05-00098-a003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/52c928b14252/fnhum-05-00098-a004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/3170918/2afc00a575b2/fnhum-05-00098-a005.jpg

相似文献

1
How do we see art: an eye-tracker study.我们如何看待艺术:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Sep 12;5:98. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00098. eCollection 2011.
2
Art expertise reduces influence of visual salience on fixation in viewing abstract-paintings.艺术专业知识可降低视觉显著性对观看抽象画时注视点的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117696. eCollection 2015.
3
What Gaze Fixation and Pupil Dilation Can Tell Us About Perceived Differences Between Abstract Art by Artists Versus by Children and Animals.注视固定和瞳孔扩张能告诉我们关于艺术家创作的抽象艺术与儿童及动物创作的抽象艺术之间感知差异的哪些信息。
Perception. 2015;44(11):1310-31. doi: 10.1177/0301006615596899. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
4
[Abstract painting, a mental esthetic construction without exact correspondence with reality (José Guerrero: manuel and corporal expressions in his paintings)].[抽象绘画,一种与现实无确切对应关系的精神美学建构(何塞·格雷罗:其绘画中的手部与身体表达)]
An R Acad Nac Med (Madr). 2006;123(3):543-50; discussion 550-5.
5
Visual exploration patterns of human figures in action: an eye tracker study with art paintings.动态人体形象的视觉探索模式:一项关于艺术绘画的眼动追踪研究
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 26;6:1636. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01636. eCollection 2015.
6
Eye Movement Correlates of Expertise in Visual Arts.视觉艺术专业技能中的眼球运动关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Mar 26;12:87. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00087. eCollection 2018.
7
Describing Art - An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Effects of Speaking on Gaze Movements during the Beholding of Paintings.描述艺术——一种关于观看绘画时言语对注视运动影响的跨学科研究方法。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e102439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102439. eCollection 2014.
8
Aristotle's dream: Evolutionary and neural aspects of aesthetic communication in the arts.亚里士多德的梦想:艺术审美交流的进化和神经基础。
Psych J. 2021 Apr;10(2):224-243. doi: 10.1002/pchj.416. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
9
Your kid could not have done that: even untutored observers can discern intentionality and structure in abstract expressionist art.你的孩子不可能做出那样的事:即使是没有受过专业训练的旁观者也能在抽象表现主义艺术中辨别出意图和结构。
Cognition. 2015 Apr;137:154-165. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
10
Movement in Aesthetic Experiences: What We Can Learn from Parkinson Disease.美感体验中的运动:我们能从帕金森病中学到什么。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jun 1;33(7):1329-1342. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01718.

引用本文的文献

1
Human creativity versus artificial intelligence: source attribution, observer attitudes, and eye movements while viewing visual art.人类创造力与人工智能:观看视觉艺术作品时的来源归因、观察者态度及眼动情况
Front Psychol. 2025 May 12;16:1509974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1509974. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing aesthetic impressions with pictorial measures: A novel approach in empirical aesthetics.用图像测量法评估审美印象:实证美学中的一种新方法。
Iperception. 2025 Feb 14;16(1):20416695241309780. doi: 10.1177/20416695241309780. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.
3
The effect of social factors on eye movements made when judging the aesthetic merit of figurative paintings.

本文引用的文献

1
Human single-neuron responses at the threshold of conscious recognition.意识识别阈值下的人类单神经元反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3599-604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707043105. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
2
Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain.人类大脑中单个神经元的不变视觉表征。
Nature. 2005 Jun 23;435(7045):1102-7. doi: 10.1038/nature03687.
3
Spatial balance of color triads in the abstract art of Piet Mondrian.皮特·蒙德里安抽象艺术中色彩三元组的空间平衡。
社会因素对视知觉判断具象绘画审美价值时眼球运动的影响
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 19;14(1):21843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72810-4.
4
Cupid stealing visual attention - the restoration of Vermeer's "Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window" altered viewing behavior.丘比特偷走视觉注意力——维米尔的《坐在敞开窗户旁读信的少女》修复后改变了观看行为。
Iperception. 2023 Nov 14;14(6):20416695231205365. doi: 10.1177/20416695231205365. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
5
How do people distribute their attention while observing ?人们在观察时如何分配注意力?
Perception. 2022 Nov;51(11):763-788. doi: 10.1177/03010066221122697. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
Exploring Visitors' Visual Behavior Using Eye-Tracking: The Case of the "".使用眼动追踪技术探索游客的视觉行为:以“”为例。
J Imaging. 2022 Jan 9;8(1):8. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8010008.
7
The role that composition plays in determining how a viewer looks at landscape art.构图在决定观者如何看待风景画方面所起的作用。
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Dec 15;13(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.2.13.
8
Does descriptive text change how people look at art? A novel analysis of eye - movements using data -driven Units of Interest.描述性文字会改变人们看待艺术的方式吗?一项使用数据驱动的兴趣单元对眼动进行的新颖分析。
J Eye Mov Res. 2017 Nov 22;10(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.10.4.4.
9
A Visual Attentive Model for Discovering Patterns in Eye-Tracking Data-A Proposal in Cultural Heritage.一种用于在眼动追踪数据中发现模式的视觉注意模型——文化遗产中的一种建议。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 8;20(7):2101. doi: 10.3390/s20072101.
10
Looking at paintings in the Vincent Van Gogh Museum: Eye movement patterns of children and adults.在梵高博物馆观赏画作:儿童与成人的眼动模式
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0178912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178912. eCollection 2017.
Perception. 2005;34(2):169-89. doi: 10.1068/p5033.
4
The artist as neuroscientist.身为神经科学家的艺术家。
Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):301-7. doi: 10.1038/434301a.
5
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.猫视觉皮层中的感受野、双眼相互作用及功能结构
J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160(1):106-54. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837.
6
Single-neuron correlates of subjective vision in the human medial temporal lobe.人类内侧颞叶主观视觉的单神经元相关性
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11;99(12):8378-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072194099. Epub 2002 May 28.
7
Visual illusions and neurobiology.视觉错觉与神经生物学。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Dec;2(12):920-6. doi: 10.1038/35104092.
8
An oblique effect in aesthetics: homage to Mondrian (1872-1944).美学中的倾斜效应:向蒙德里安(1872 - 1944)致敬。
Perception. 2000;29(8):981-7. doi: 10.1068/p2352.
9
Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.多稳态现象:感知中的变化观点。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jul;3(7):254-264. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01332-7.
10
Single units and conscious vision.单个神经元与有意识视觉。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Nov 29;353(1377):1801-18. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0333.