• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的术前列腺癌预测诺莫图:与其他选择主动监测患者的工具相比的准确性和误差率。

A new preoperative nomogram to predict minimal prostate cancer: accuracy and error rates compared to other tools to select patients for active surveillance.

机构信息

Tissugen Pty Ltd, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.

出版信息

J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1811-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.060. Epub 2011 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.060
PMID:21944097
Abstract

PURPOSE

We designed and fully evaluated the performance of a nomogram to identify patients with prostate cancer who may be suitable for active surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed a nomogram to predict the probability of minimal prostate cancer (total tumor volume less than 0.5 cc, organ confined disease and no Gleason pattern 4 or 5) using preoperative data on 2,525 Australian patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Accuracy and error rates at multiple probability cutoffs were compared with those of contemporary Epstein criteria and the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance trial inclusion criteria when applied to these patients. High risk disease was defined as 1 or more adverse characteristics (including positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, 50% or greater Gleason pattern 4/5 and/or tumor volume 4.0 cc or greater) at radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Minimal cancer was confirmed in 152 men (6.0%) at prostatectomy. The bootstrap corrected predictive accuracy of our nomogram was 93.3% vs 89.1% and 91.0% for Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance and Epstein criteria, respectively. For men with a nomogram derived minimal cancer probability of 0% to 4.9%, 5.0% to 19.9%, 20.0% to 34.9%, 35.0% to 49.9% and 50.0% to 71.0% the rate of high risk disease was 70.8%, 37.8%, 22.4%, 9.0% and 3.8%, respectively. In contrast, the rate of high risk disease for men who met Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance and Epstein criteria were 17.1% and 13.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A detailed breakdown of the expected rates of false-positive results and high risk disease associated with the nomogram derived probability of minimal cancer would provide more complete information to clinicians and patients on which to base therapeutic clinical decisions for presumed early stage prostate cancer.

摘要

目的

我们设计并全面评估了一种列线图的性能,以确定可能适合主动监测的前列腺癌患者。

材料和方法

我们使用 2525 名接受根治性前列腺切除术的澳大利亚患者的术前数据,开发了一种预测微小前列腺癌(总肿瘤体积小于 0.5cc,器官受限疾病且无 Gleason 模式 4 或 5)概率的列线图。在这些患者中,将其与当代 Epstein 标准和前列腺癌研究国际:主动监测试验纳入标准的多个概率截断值的准确性和误差率进行了比较。高风险疾病定义为根治性前列腺切除术后存在 1 种或多种不良特征(包括阳性手术切缘、精囊侵犯、包膜外延伸、50%或更高的 Gleason 模式 4/5 和/或肿瘤体积 4.0cc 或更大)。

结果

在前列腺切除术中,152 名患者(6.0%)证实存在微小癌。我们的列线图的 bootstrap 校正预测准确性分别为 93.3%、89.1%和 91.0%,用于前列腺癌研究国际:主动监测和 Epstein 标准。对于列线图预测微小癌概率为 0%至 4.9%、5.0%至 19.9%、20.0%至 34.9%、35.0%至 49.9%和 50.0%至 71.0%的男性,高风险疾病的发生率分别为 70.8%、37.8%、22.4%、9.0%和 3.8%。相比之下,符合前列腺癌研究国际:主动监测和 Epstein 标准的男性高风险疾病的发生率分别为 17.1%和 13.9%。

结论

详细分析列线图预测微小癌概率的假阳性结果和高风险疾病的预期发生率,将为临床医生和患者提供更完整的信息,以便根据假定的早期前列腺癌做出治疗临床决策。

相似文献

1
A new preoperative nomogram to predict minimal prostate cancer: accuracy and error rates compared to other tools to select patients for active surveillance.一种新的术前列腺癌预测诺莫图:与其他选择主动监测患者的工具相比的准确性和误差率。
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1811-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.060. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
2
Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.使用2005年国际泌尿病理学会关于Gleason分级的共识,对日本临床局限性前列腺癌患者进行Partin表验证及术前列线图的开发:来自局限性前列腺癌临床病理研究组的数据
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.047. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
3
A nomogram for predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer: a tool in selecting patients for active surveillance.一种预测低体积/低级别前列腺癌的列线图:一种用于选择患者进行主动监测的工具。
Cancer. 2007 Dec 1;110(11):2441-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23055.
4
A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.一种用于识别前列腺癌患者盆腔淋巴结转移风险降低的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1798-803. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091805.98960.13.
5
Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men.当代男性根治性前列腺切除术中预测临床意义不显著前列腺癌工具的批判性评估
Cancer. 2008 Aug 15;113(4):701-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23610.
6
Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.低危前列腺癌患者符合前列腺癌国际主动监测标准行根治性前列腺切除术的病理和生化结局。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):914-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11658.x. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
7
Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols.适合主动监测的患者的前列腺癌病理学特征:当代方案的头对头比较。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
8
Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.澳大利亚前列腺癌患者三种风险评估工具的比较分析。
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108 Suppl 2:51-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10687.x.
9
Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后早期复发概率的列线图。
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.033. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
10
Factors predicting prostatic biopsy Gleason sum under grading.预测前列腺活检 Gleason 评分的因素。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):118-22; discussion 123-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.127. Epub 2009 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Contemporary Selection Criteria in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.当代前列腺癌患者主动监测选择标准的诊断准确性:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;11:810736. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.810736. eCollection 2021.
2
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Survival Model With Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Cancer.开发和验证一种基于患者报告结局的癌症患者预后生存模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e201768. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1768.
3
Decision models for distinguishing between clinically insignificant and significant tumors in prostate cancer biopsies: an application of Bayes' Theorem to reduce costs and improve outcomes.
用于区分前列腺癌活检中临床无意义和有意义肿瘤的决策模型:贝叶斯定理的应用可降低成本并改善结果。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Mar;23(1):102-116. doi: 10.1007/s10729-019-09480-6. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Evaluation of models predicting insignificant prostate cancer to select men for active surveillance of prostate cancer.预测低危前列腺癌的模型评估,以选择适合前列腺癌主动监测的男性。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Jun;18(2):137-43. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.1. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
5
Clinical implications of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging based nomogram applied to prostate cancer active surveillance.基于多参数磁共振成像的列线图应用于前列腺癌主动监测的临床意义
J Urol. 2015 Jun;193(6):1943-1949. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.088. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
6
A three-protein biomarker panel assessed in diagnostic tissue predicts death from prostate cancer for men with localized disease.在诊断组织中评估的一种三蛋白生物标志物组合可预测局限性疾病男性前列腺癌的死亡情况。
Cancer Med. 2014 Oct;3(5):1266-74. doi: 10.1002/cam4.281. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
7
Prostate cancer nomograms: a review of their use in cancer detection and treatment.前列腺癌列线图:在癌症检测和治疗中的应用综述。
Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Mar;15(3):391. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0391-0.
8
International multicentre study examining selection criteria for active surveillance in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.国际多中心研究,探讨接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性中主动监测的选择标准。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 23;107(9):1467-73. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.400. Epub 2012 Oct 4.