• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较三种不同剂量琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠和琥珀酰胆碱用于电抽搐治疗时罗库溴铵诱导的肌肉松弛逆转后恢复时间。

Comparison of recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex and succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University, School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):855-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1236-y. Epub 2011 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00540-011-1236-y
PMID:21947754
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to compare recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex with succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

METHODS

Seventeen patients who were scheduled to undergo ECT were studied. Anesthesia was induced by use of propofol (1.0 mg/kg) followed by either succinylcholine (SCC) (1 mg/kg) or rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). Assisted mask ventilation was initiated with 100% oxygen. After T1 was assessed as being zero by neuromuscular monitoring, an electroshock stimulus was applied bilaterally. Patients receiving rocuronium were infused with 16, 8, or 4 mg/kg sugammadex immediately after the seizure stopped to reverse the muscle relaxation. Neuromuscular monitoring was continued until recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 at the tibial nerve in the leg. The times to recovery of T1 to 10 and 90% with both relaxants were compared.

RESULTS

The time to recovery of T1 to 90% after 16 mg/kg sugammadex was shorter than that in subjects treated with SCC (p = 0.046), whereas that after 4 mg/kg sugammadex was longer than that in subjects treated with SCC (SCC group: 429 ± 65 s, 16 mg/kg sugammadex group: 387 ± 63 s*, 8 mg/kg sugammadex group: 462 ± 66 s, 4 mg/kg sugammadex group: 563 ± 45 s(*,#); *p < 0.05 compared with SCC, (#)p < 0.01 compared with 16 mg/kg sugammadex).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the efficacy of rocuronium-sugammadex as an alternative to SCC for muscle relaxation during ECT, and indicates that 8 mg/kg sugammadex produces equally rapid recovery from rocuronium muscular relaxation compared with spontaneous recovery from 1 mg/kg SCC during ECT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在电抽搐治疗(ECT)中,使用三种不同剂量的琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠逆转罗库溴铵诱导的肌肉松弛与使用琥珀酰胆碱(SCC)后恢复时间的差异。

方法

研究了 17 名计划接受 ECT 的患者。麻醉诱导采用丙泊酚(1.0mg/kg),随后给予 SCC(1mg/kg)或罗库溴铵(0.6mg/kg)。用 100%氧气辅助面罩通气。当神经肌肉监测显示 T1 为零时,双侧施加电刺激。接受罗库溴铵的患者在抽搐停止后立即输注 16、8 或 4mg/kg 的琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠以逆转肌肉松弛。继续进行神经肌肉监测,直到胫骨神经的四成串刺激比在腿部恢复至 0.9。比较两种松弛剂恢复 T1 至 10%和 90%的时间。

结果

与接受 SCC 治疗的患者相比,16mg/kg 琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠组恢复 T1 至 90%的时间更短(p=0.046),而 4mg/kg 琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠组恢复时间更长(SCC 组:429±65s,16mg/kg 琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠组:387±63s*,8mg/kg 琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠组:462±66s,4mg/kg 琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠组:563±45s*,#);*p<0.05 与 SCC 相比,(#)p<0.01 与 16mg/kg 琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠相比)。

结论

本研究表明,罗库溴铵-琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠作为 SCC 的替代方案,可用于 ECT 期间的肌肉松弛,并且表明在 ECT 期间,与 1mg/kg SCC 自发恢复相比,8mg/kg 琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠可使罗库溴铵肌肉松弛更快恢复。

相似文献

1
Comparison of recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex and succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy.比较三种不同剂量琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠和琥珀酰胆碱用于电抽搐治疗时罗库溴铵诱导的肌肉松弛逆转后恢复时间。
J Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):855-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1236-y. Epub 2011 Sep 24.
2
Recovery time after sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation for electroconvulsive therapy is independent of cardiac output in both young and elderly patients.在接受电休克治疗的患者中,使用 sugammadex 逆转罗库溴铵诱导的肌肉松弛后,恢复时间与心输出量无关,无论患者年龄大小。
J ECT. 2013 Mar;29(1):33-6. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31826cf348.
3
Use of rocuronium-sugammadex, an alternative to succinylcholine, as a muscle relaxant during electroconvulsive therapy.在电抽搐治疗中使用罗库溴铵-琥珀胆碱作为肌肉松弛剂的替代药物。
J Anesth. 2011 Apr;25(2):286-90. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1095-6. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
4
[Efficacy of sugammadex in the reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium in long-duration surgery: under inhaled vs. intravenous anesthesia].舒更葡糖钠在长时间手术中逆转罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞的疗效:吸入麻醉与静脉麻醉对比
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2009 Jun-Jul;56(6):349-54. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(09)70407-4.
5
Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine.罗库溴铵给药三分钟后使用舒更葡糖钠逆转深度神经肌肉阻滞:与琥珀胆碱自发恢复的比较。
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1020-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819dabb0.
6
Low-Dose or High-Dose Rocuronium Reversed with Neostigmine or Sugammadex for Cesarean Delivery Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial of Time to Tracheal Intubation and Extubation.新斯的明或舒更葡糖用于剖宫产麻醉时低剂量或高剂量罗库溴铵的逆转:气管插管和拔管时间的随机对照非劣效性试验
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1536-45. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001197.
7
Optimal anesthetic regimen for ambulatory laser microlaryngeal surgery.门诊激光显微喉手术的最佳麻醉方案
Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1135-1139. doi: 10.1002/lary.26368. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
The Myth of Rescue Reversal in "Can't Intubate, Can't Ventilate" Scenarios.“无法插管,无法通气”情况下救援逆转的神话。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jul;123(1):82-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001347.
9
Case report: Neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium following sugammadex administration.病例报告:罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞在向纳曲酮给药后发生。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:166-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.11.004. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
A case where rocuronium was unable to achieve neuromuscular block immediately after sugammadex administration.一例在给予舒更葡糖钠后罗库溴铵未能立即实现神经肌肉阻滞的病例。
J Med Invest. 2011 Feb;58(1-2):163-5. doi: 10.2152/jmi.58.163.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding Our Research Article on "Effect of Different Doses of Sugammadex on Recovery and Hemodynamic Parameters in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy".对致编辑的信的回复,该信涉及我们关于“不同剂量舒更葡糖钠对接受电休克治疗患者逆转神经肌肉阻滞的恢复及血流动力学参数的影响”的研究文章。
Medeni Med J. 2025 Mar 28;40(1):35-36. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2025.33667.
2
Current evidence on the use of sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade antagonism during electroconvulsive therapy: a narrative review.关于舒更葡糖钠在电休克治疗期间用于拮抗神经肌肉阻滞的当前证据:一项叙述性综述。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2025 Feb;78(1):3-15. doi: 10.4097/kja.24234. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Use of rocuronium-sugammadex, an alternative to succinylcholine, as a muscle relaxant during electroconvulsive therapy.在电抽搐治疗中使用罗库溴铵-琥珀胆碱作为肌肉松弛剂的替代药物。
J Anesth. 2011 Apr;25(2):286-90. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1095-6. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
2
Rocuronium antagonized by sugammadex for series of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a patient with pseudocholinesterase deficiency.罗库溴铵用 sugammadex 拮抗用于假性胆碱酯酶缺乏患者的一系列电抽搐治疗 (ECT)。
J ECT. 2011 Mar;27(1):e47-8. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318205e1d3.
3
[Effects of anesthetic agents on seizure duration and hemodynamics in electroconvulsive therapy].
Effect of Different Doses of Sugammadex on Recovery and Hemodynamic Parameters in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy.
不同剂量舒更葡糖钠对接受电休克治疗患者逆转神经肌肉阻滞时恢复情况及血流动力学参数的影响
Medeni Med J. 2024 Mar 21;39(1):16-23. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2024.60052.
4
Does the Use of Rocuronium-Sugammadex Instead of Succinylcholine in Electroconvulsive Therapy Affect Seizure Duration?在电休克治疗中使用罗库溴铵-舒更葡糖钠而非琥珀酰胆碱是否会影响癫痫发作持续时间?
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Oct;19(10):824-831. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0123. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
5
The Use of Succinylcholine in Brugada Syndrome: A Case Report and Discussion of Literature.布加综合征中琥珀酰胆碱的应用:一例病例报告及文献讨论
Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct 27;2019:5182672. doi: 10.1155/2019/5182672. eCollection 2019.
6
The Effects of Rocuronium-sugammadex on Fetomaternal Outcomes in Pregnancy Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review.罗库溴铵-舒更葡糖钠对接受电休克治疗的妊娠患者母婴结局的影响:一项回顾性病例系列研究及文献综述
Cureus. 2019 Jun 3;11(6):e4820. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4820.
7
Comparison between succinylcholine and rocuronium as neuromuscular blocking agents for electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with pseudocholinesterase deficiency.琥珀酰胆碱与罗库溴铵作为假性胆碱酯酶缺乏患者电休克治疗神经肌肉阻滞剂的比较。
JA Clin Rep. 2015;1(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40981-015-0009-2. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
8
Sugammadex as a reversal agent for neuromuscular block: an evidence-based review.舒更葡糖钠作为神经肌肉阻滞的逆转剂:一项循证综述。
Core Evid. 2013;8:57-67. doi: 10.2147/CE.S35675. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
[麻醉剂对电休克治疗中癫痫发作持续时间和血流动力学的影响]
Masui. 2009 Oct;58(10):1266-9.
4
[Anesthetic management for electroconvulsive therapy in the patients with a history of neuroleptic malignant syndrome].[有抗精神病药恶性综合征病史患者的电休克治疗的麻醉管理]
Masui. 2009 May;58(5):633-6.
5
Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine.罗库溴铵给药三分钟后使用舒更葡糖钠逆转深度神经肌肉阻滞:与琥珀胆碱自发恢复的比较。
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1020-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819dabb0.
6
Relationship between cardiac output and onset of succinylcholine chloride action in electroconvulsive therapy patients.电抽搐治疗患者心输出量与琥珀酰胆碱氯作用开始之间的关系。
J ECT. 2009 Dec;25(4):246-9. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181926ac0.
7
Goodbye suxamethonium!再见,琥珀胆碱!
Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64 Suppl 1:73-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05873.x.
8
A cross-over, post-electroconvulsive therapy comparison of clinical recovery from rocuronium versus succinylcholine.罗库溴铵与琥珀酰胆碱在电休克治疗后临床恢复情况的交叉比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2008 Dec;20(8):589-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.006.
9
Reversal of profound, high-dose rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex at two different time points: an international, multicenter, randomized, dose-finding, safety assessor-blinded, phase II trial.在两个不同时间点使用舒更葡糖钠逆转深度、高剂量罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞:一项国际、多中心、随机、剂量探索、安全性评估者设盲的II期试验
Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug;109(2):188-97. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f5bc7.
10
Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized trial in emergent cases.罗库溴铵与琥珀酰胆碱用于快速顺序诱导麻醉和气管插管:一项针对急诊病例的前瞻性随机试验。
Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5):1356-1361. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180196.58567.FE.