Warne Garry L, Mann Annabelle
Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Sep;47(9):661-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02164.x.
Intense controversy surrounds the management of disorders of sex development, particularly in relation to the validity of parental consent for genital surgery and the removal of gonadal tissue carried out during infancy or childhood. Past practices have been heavily criticised on ethical grounds by patient advocacy organisations, who have demanded a moratorium on these kinds of operations unless authorised by a court. Some doctors and hospital administrators have been influenced by the controversy and have referred cases to the Family Court of Australia, where a series of judgements have now established legal precedents that apply across Australia, restricting the circumstances in which parents can give consent for surgery. An alternative approach is to use a hospital-based Clinical Ethics Response Group and, if necessary, Clinical Ethics Committee, which has lay and legal representatives as well as health professionals, as a semi-independent committee of review. Finding a solution that protects the human rights and best interests of children is an ongoing challenge.
性发育障碍的管理引发了激烈的争议,特别是在婴儿期或儿童期进行生殖器手术和切除性腺组织时父母同意的有效性方面。过去的做法受到了患者权益倡导组织基于伦理理由的严厉批评,他们要求暂停此类手术,除非得到法院授权。一些医生和医院管理人员受到了争议的影响,并将病例提交给了澳大利亚家庭法院,现在一系列判决在澳大利亚确立了适用的法律先例,限制了父母可以给予手术同意的情况。另一种方法是使用以医院为基础的临床伦理反应小组,必要时还可使用临床伦理委员会,该委员会有非专业和法律代表以及卫生专业人员,作为一个半独立的审查委员会。找到保护儿童人权和最大利益的解决方案是一项持续的挑战。