Raveenthiran V
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sri Ramasamy Memorial (SRM) Medical College SRM University, Chennai, India.
J Neonatal Surg. 2017 Aug 10;6(3):58. doi: 10.21699/jns.v6i3.604. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
Management of ambiguous genitalia is highly controversial. This condition was known previously as intersex and presently as disorders of sex development (DSD). There is no consensus regarding the choice, timing and method of sex assignment in neonates with DSD. Consensus conferences could not unify the views of various stakeholders and third parties. This article philosophically examines the nature and origin of such controversies. Misconception, bias and conflicting priorities are identified as the three cardinal sources of controversies. Conceptual duality of sexes, confused notion of sex and gender, bias towards penetrative intercourse, conflict between utopian ideals and reality, unwillingness to compromise are identified as perpetuators of controversies. Suggestions are made regarding sex assignment in various types of DSD based on the understanding of published literature and the author's personal experience.
两性畸形的管理极具争议性。这种情况以前被称为雌雄同体,目前称为性发育障碍(DSD)。对于患有DSD的新生儿的性别指定选择、时机和方法,目前尚无共识。共识会议未能统一各利益相关者和第三方的观点。本文从哲学角度审视了此类争议的性质和根源。错误观念、偏见和相互冲突的优先事项被确定为争议的三个主要根源。性别概念的二元性、对性和性别的混淆概念、对插入式性交的偏见、乌托邦理想与现实之间的冲突、不愿妥协被确定为争议的持续因素。基于对已发表文献的理解和作者的个人经验,针对各种类型的DSD的性别指定提出了建议。