• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助胃癌 D2 淋巴结清扫术的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;105(3):297-303. doi: 10.1002/jso.22098. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1002/jso.22098
PMID:21952834
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the value of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 dissection for treatment of gastric cancer.

METHODS

We collected studies that have compared laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 dissection for treatment of gastric cancer in the past 15 years. Data of interest for LADG and ODG were subjected to meta-analysis using a fixed-effect and random-effect model.

RESULTS

We analyzed 8 studies that included 1,065 patients. There were significant differences in operating time, blood loss, time to first flatus and first eating, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications between the LADG and ODG groups. Compared with the ODG group, blood loss and complications in the LADG group decreased, time to recovery of gastrointestinal function and hospitalization period were shorter, but operating time was longer. There were no significant differences in the number of harvested lymph nodes, mortality, and rate of recurrence between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ODG, LADG with D2 dissection has the advantages of minimal invasion, faster recovery, and fewer complications, and it can achieve the same degree of radicality and short-term prognosis as ODG. The drawbacks are that the operating time is slightly longer and long-term prognosis is not clear.

摘要

背景

评估腹腔镜辅助下 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌的价值。

方法

我们收集了过去 15 年来比较腹腔镜辅助下远端胃切除术(LADG)和开腹远端胃切除术(ODG)加 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌的研究。使用固定效应和随机效应模型对 LADG 和 ODG 的数据进行荟萃分析。

结果

我们分析了 8 项研究,共纳入 1065 例患者。LADG 组与 ODG 组在手术时间、出血量、首次排气和首次进食时间、术后住院时间和术后并发症方面存在显著差异。与 ODG 组相比,LADG 组的出血量和并发症减少,胃肠功能恢复时间和住院时间缩短,但手术时间延长。两组的淋巴结清扫数目、死亡率和复发率无显著差异。

结论

与 ODG 相比,LADG 加 D2 淋巴结清扫术具有微创、恢复更快、并发症更少的优点,能够达到与 ODG 相同的根治性和短期预后。缺点是手术时间略长,长期预后尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助胃癌 D2 淋巴结清扫术的荟萃分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;105(3):297-303. doi: 10.1002/jso.22098. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
2
Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it an alternative to the open approach?腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌:它是开放手术的替代方法吗?
Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;18(4):322-33. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.08.006. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
3
Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜辅助下与传统开放远端胃切除术及胃周外淋巴结清扫术的比较
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;91(1):90-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.20271.
4
Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术的荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2011 Dec;171(2):479-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 6.
5
[Short-term efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection in distal gastric cancer].腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术联合淋巴结清扫术治疗远端胃癌的短期疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;12(6):584-7.
6
Laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomies for early gastric cancer at a general hospital in Japan.日本一家综合医院中腹腔镜辅助和开放远端胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Jan-Feb;52(61):293-7.
7
Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: initial experience.腹腔镜辅助D2根治性远端胃癌切除术治疗进展期胃癌:初步经验
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Jun 20;122(12):1404-7.
8
Comparative analysis of station-specific lymph node yield in laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜与开放远端胃切除术中特定部位淋巴结清扫数量的比较分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Dec;21(6):424-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182367dee.
9
[Meta-analysis of laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌切除术的Meta分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Apr 23;93(16):1224-9.
10
Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy.腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术与开放远端胃切除术的比较研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jun;202(6):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.02.028.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status, trends, and controversies in the selection of gastrectomy procedures: Insights from two nationwide questionnaire surveys conducted over a 7-year interval in Japan.胃癌切除手术选择的现状、趋势及争议:来自日本在7年时间间隔内进行的两项全国性问卷调查的见解
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Mar 18;9(5):903-919. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70015. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection for tracing in patients with gastric cancer: a single-blind, single-center, phase I clinical trial.盐酸米托蒽醌注射液用于胃癌患者示踪的安全性、耐受性及药代动力学:一项单盲、单中心的I期临床试验
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 15;14(4):1675-1684. doi: 10.62347/LSDV5580. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of the Biomechanical Properties between Healthy and Whole Human and Porcine Stomachs.健康完整的人体和猪胃生物力学特性的比较
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;11(3):233. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030233.
4
Emergency exploratory laparotomy and radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer combined with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.胃癌合并急性上消化道出血患者的急诊剖腹探查术及根治性胃切除术。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):1423-1433. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1423.
5
Case Report: Transvaginal specimen extraction following totally laparoscopic D2 distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a patient with situs inversus totalis: with video.病例报告:全腹腔镜D2远端胃癌根治术治疗全内脏转位患者后经阴道标本取出术:附视频
Front Oncol. 2023 May 23;13:1189948. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1189948. eCollection 2023.
6
Laparoscopic vs. Open Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Case-Control Study.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性病例对照研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 9;29(3):1840-1865. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030151.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.机器人与腹腔镜胃癌手术比较:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状综述。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1673-1689. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01059-7. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
Effect of endoscopic resection on short-term surgical outcomes of subsequent laparoscopic gastrectomy: a meta-analysis.内镜切除对后续腹腔镜胃切除术短期手术结局的影响:一项荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 14;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02230-5.
9
Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: cost-effectiveness analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃大部切除术治疗胃腺癌的成本效果分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):830-839. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50327. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较:系统评价。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun 13;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01888-7.