De Vos Jan
Ghent University, Belgium.
Hist Human Sci. 2011;24(3):103-22. doi: 10.1177/0952695111398572.
Humanitarian aid's psycho-therapeutic turn in the 1990s was mirrored by the increasing emotionalization and subjectivation of fund-raising campaigns. In order to grasp the depth of this interconnectedness, this article argues that in both cases what we see is the post-Fordist production paradigm at work; namely, as Hardt and Negri put it, the direct production of subjectivity and social relations. To explore this, the therapeutic and mental health approach in humanitarian aid is juxtaposed with the more general phenomenon of psychologization. This allows us to see that the psychologized production of subjectivity has a problematic waste-product as it reduces the human to 'Homo sacer', to use Giorgi Agamben's term. Drawing out a double matrix of a de-psychologizing psychologization connected to a politicizing de-politicization, it will further become possible to understand psycho-therapeutic humanitarianism as a case of how, in these times of globalization, psychology, subjectivity and money are all interrelated.
20世纪90年代人道主义援助向心理治疗的转变,反映在筹款活动日益情绪化和主观化上。为了理解这种相互联系的深度,本文认为,在这两种情况下,我们看到的都是后福特主义生产范式在起作用;也就是说,用哈特和奈格里的话来说,是主体性和社会关系的直接生产。为了探讨这一点,将人道主义援助中的治疗和心理健康方法与更普遍的心理化现象并列起来。这使我们看到,主体性的心理化生产有一个有问题的废品,因为它将人简化为“神圣人”,借用乔治·阿甘本的术语。勾勒出与政治化的去政治化相联系的去心理化的心理化的双重矩阵,将进一步有可能理解心理治疗人道主义,作为全球化时代心理学、主体性和金钱如何相互关联的一个例子。