Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065102.
Over the last one hundred years, humanitarian agencies have considered children primarily through the lens of vulnerability. Advocacy for attention to children's agency and for their participation has burgeoned since the 1980s without shifting the powerful hold that assumptions of vulnerability have had over the policy and practices of humanitarians. This article seeks to denaturalise the conceptualisation of children in contexts of emergency as primarily vulnerable (would-be) victims, placing it in historical and geopolitical contexts. It offers a critical analysis of both conventional humanitarian thinking about vulnerability per se and the reasons for its continued invocation in settings of displacement and political violence. Drawing upon examples from the Mau Mau rebellion against British colonial rule in 1950s Kenya, and current humanitarian response to the situation of Palestinian children living under Israeli occupation, this article relates the continued dominance of the vulnerability paradigm to the pursuit of self-interest by elites and the survival strategies of humanitarian agencies. It pays particular attention to the uses to which mental health thinking and programming is put in what may be called the 'politics of pathologisation'.
在过去的一百年中,人道主义机构主要从脆弱性的角度来看待儿童。自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,倡导关注儿童的能动性和参与性的呼声日益高涨,但这并没有改变假设的脆弱性对人道主义政策和实践的强大影响。本文试图将紧急情况下儿童概念化的主要是脆弱(潜在)受害者的观点非自然化,将其置于历史和地缘政治背景下。本文对脆弱性本身的传统人道主义思维以及在流离失所和政治暴力背景下继续援引脆弱性的原因进行了批判性分析。本文通过引用 20 世纪 50 年代肯尼亚茅茅起义反抗英国殖民统治和当前人道主义组织对生活在以色列占领下的巴勒斯坦儿童的情况的回应两个例子,将脆弱性范式的持续主导地位与精英追求自身利益和人道主义机构的生存策略联系起来。本文特别关注心理健康思维和规划在所谓的“病态化政治”中的运用。