Dos Santos Aline M, Carneiro Fabiana P, Queiroz Amadeu J R, Damasceno Emanuel A M, de Castro Tércia M M L, de Amorim Rivadávio F B, Takano Gustavo H S, Junqueira Maria I M B, de Magalhães Albino V
Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
J Cutan Pathol. 2011 Nov;38(11):871-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2011.01780.x.
Since the use of laminin-5 as a marker of invasiveness has been proposed by several authors, our objective was to compare the expression of this protein in pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
Sixty-four paraffin-embedded skin biopsy samples with diagnosis of epidermal hyperplasia (non-pseudocarcinomatous), pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia, actinic keratosis/carcinoma in situ, microinvasive and frankly invasive SCC were obtained for immunohistochemical study.
Adjacent normal epithelium and epidermal hyperplasia (non-pseudocarcinomatous) showed no staining. In pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia, laminin-5 was positive, at least focally, in 14 of 16 (87.5%) samples and was concentrated in peripheral cells of elongated rete pegs and in migrating cells in dermis. In samples of microinvasive carcinoma (n = 7), the expression was observed in all cases and was concentrated in the leading edge of the tumor. All cases (n = 21) of frankly invasive SCC showed cells expressing laminin-5, at least focally. Well-differentiated areas of the tumor presented a pattern of expression in peripheral cells of tumor nests while a diffuse pattern of expression was observed in less differentiated areas.
We showed that cytoplasmic laminin-5 expression should not be used as a criterion of malignancy and is not useful in distinguishing pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia from microinvasive and well-differentiated SCC.
由于有几位作者提出将层粘连蛋白-5用作侵袭性的标志物,我们的目的是比较该蛋白在假癌性增生和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)中的表达。
获取64例经诊断为表皮增生(非假癌性)、假癌性增生、光化性角化病/原位癌、微浸润性和明显浸润性SCC的石蜡包埋皮肤活检样本,进行免疫组织化学研究。
相邻正常上皮和表皮增生(非假癌性)未见染色。在假癌性增生中,16例样本中有14例(87.5%)层粘连蛋白-5呈阳性,至少局灶性阳性,且集中在延长的 rete 钉突的外周细胞和真皮中的迁移细胞中。在微浸润癌样本(n = 7)中,所有病例均观察到表达,且集中在肿瘤的前沿。所有明显浸润性SCC病例(n = 21)均显示细胞表达层粘连蛋白-5,至少局灶性表达。肿瘤的高分化区域在肿瘤巢外周细胞中呈现表达模式,而在低分化区域观察到弥漫性表达模式。
我们表明,细胞质层粘连蛋白-5表达不应用作恶性标准,且在区分假癌性增生与微浸润性和高分化SCC方面并无用处。