Veterinary Services Department, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK.
Vet J. 2012 Jun;192(3):382-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.024. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Serology has been used to diagnose retrospectively types C and D outbreaks of botulism in cattle in Australia and this study has investigated whether the approach would be applicable in England and Wales. Three hundred sera from routine surveillance submissions in England and Wales were used as a negative control population. Some stored sera were available from a small number of clinical cases of botulism and 125 samples were collected from cohort groups of clinical cases in four new outbreaks of botulism. Three of these outbreaks were identified as being caused by type D Clostridium botulinum toxin. Sera were tested by antibody ELISA in laboratories in Australia and Germany. There was no increase in the proportion of animals seropositive to type C or D antibody in the botulism-associated cattle. The proportion of samples which were seropositive to type D antibodies was <2% in both the negative control and outbreak populations. It was concluded that single time serology is unlikely to be helpful for retrospective diagnosis of outbreaks of type D botulism in England and Wales.
血清学已被用于回顾性诊断澳大利亚牛的 C 型和 D 型肉毒梭菌暴发,本研究探讨了该方法是否适用于英格兰和威尔士。从英格兰和威尔士的常规监测提交的 300 份血清被用作阴性对照人群。从少数肉毒梭菌临床病例中保存了一些血清,从四起新暴发的肉毒梭菌临床病例的队列组中收集了 125 份样本。其中三起暴发被确定为由 D 型肉毒梭菌毒素引起。在澳大利亚和德国的实验室中,通过抗体 ELISA 对血清进行了检测。与肉毒梭菌相关的牛中,C 型或 D 型抗体呈阳性的动物比例没有增加。阴性对照和暴发人群中,D 型抗体呈阳性的样本比例均<2%。因此,单次血清学检测不太可能有助于回顾性诊断英格兰和威尔士的 D 型肉毒梭菌暴发。