Edwards S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S3G4, Canada.
Int J Neural Syst. 2011 Oct;21(5):367-83. doi: 10.1142/S0129065711002894.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been noted for its potential to suppress epileptic seizures. To date, DBS has achieved mixed results as a therapeutic approach to seizure control. Using a computational model, we demonstrate that high-complexity, biologically-inspired responsive neuromodulation is superior to periodic forms of neuromodulation (responsive and non-responsive) such as those implemented in DBS, as well as neuromodulation using random and random repetitive-interval stimulation. We configured radial basis function (RBF) networks to generate outputs modeling interictal time series recorded from rodent hippocampal slices that were perfused with low Mg²⁺/high K⁺ solution. We then compared the performance of RBF-based interictal modulation, periodic biphasic-pulse modulation, random modulation and random repetitive modulation on a cognitive rhythm generator (CRG) model of spontaneous seizure-like events (SLEs), testing efficacy of SLE control. A statistically significant improvement in SLE mitigation for the RBF interictal modulation case versus the periodic and random cases was observed, suggesting that the use of biologically-inspired neuromodulators may achieve better results for the purpose of electrical control of seizures in a clinical setting.
深部脑刺激 (DBS) 因其抑制癫痫发作的潜力而备受关注。迄今为止,DBS 作为一种治疗癫痫发作的方法取得了混合的结果。使用计算模型,我们证明了高复杂度、基于生物启发的响应性神经调节优于周期性神经调节形式(响应性和非响应性),例如 DBS 中实现的神经调节,以及使用随机和随机重复间隔刺激的神经调节。我们配置了径向基函数 (RBF) 网络,以生成输出,模拟在低镁²⁺/高 K⁺溶液中灌流的啮齿动物海马切片中的发作间期时间序列。然后,我们在自发似癫痫事件 (SLE) 的认知节律发生器 (CRG) 模型上比较了基于 RBF 的发作间期调制、周期性双相脉冲调制、随机调制和随机重复调制的性能,测试了 SLE 控制的效果。与周期性和随机情况相比,RBF 发作间期调制情况下 SLE 缓解的统计学显著改善表明,使用基于生物启发的神经调节剂可能会在临床环境中实现更好的结果,用于电控制癫痫发作。