Galvin Danika, Wilding Clare, Whiteford Gail
School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2011 Oct;58(5):378-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00967.x.
This article reports some preliminary findings of an Australian action research project that aimed to investigate, and affect, occupational therapists' understanding of human rights theory and occupational justice philosophy in everyday occupational therapy practice.
Over the course of one year, nine therapists from a range of practice areas in a major metropolitan hospital participated in monthly discussion groups. Narrative data was collected through audio-recording and transcribing the discussions. Data was qualitatively analysed using line-by-line coding and theme-building.
Two preliminary themes are discussed herein: the invisibility of human rights issues in an Australian occupational therapy setting and the dissonance between the ideal and the reality of human rights practice in occupational therapy.
The authors suggest that through discussion, and with the support of a community of practice dedicated to exploring human rights and occupational justice issues, occupational therapists can increase their awareness of human rights challenges. And, therapists can increase their actions to better enable occupational justice in their practice.
本文报告了一项澳大利亚行动研究项目的一些初步结果,该项目旨在调查并影响职业治疗师在日常职业治疗实践中对人权理论和职业正义理念的理解。
在一年的时间里,来自一家大型都市医院不同实践领域的九名治疗师参加了每月一次的讨论小组。通过对讨论进行录音和转录来收集叙事数据。使用逐行编码和主题构建对数据进行定性分析。
本文讨论了两个初步主题:在澳大利亚职业治疗环境中人权问题的不可见性,以及职业治疗中人权实践的理想与现实之间的不一致。
作者建议,通过讨论,并在致力于探索人权和职业正义问题的实践社区的支持下,职业治疗师可以提高对人权挑战的认识。并且,治疗师可以增加行动,以便在实践中更好地实现职业正义。