Department of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Bioresour Technol. 2011 Nov;102(22):10759-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.131. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
This study was undertaken to compare the chemical properties and yields of pineapple leaf residue (PLR) char produced by field burning (CF) with that produced by a partial combustion of air-dried PLR at 340 °C for 3 h in a furnace (CL). Higher total C, lignin content, and yield from CL as well as the presence of aromatic compounds in the Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of the char produced from CL suggest that the CL process was better in sequestering C than was the CF process. Although the C/N ratio of char produced from CL was low indicating a high N content of the char, the C in the char produced from CL was dominated by lignin suggesting that the decomposition of char produced from CL would be slow. To sequester C by char application, the PLR should be combusted in a controlled process rather than by burning in the field.
本研究旨在比较通过田间燃烧(CF)和在炉中于 340°C 下对风干的菠萝叶残渣(PLR)进行部分空气燃烧 3 小时(CL)两种方式生产的菠萝叶残渣炭的化学性质和得率。来自 CL 的炭的总 C、木质素含量和产率较高,傅里叶变换红外光谱中存在芳香族化合物,这表明 CL 过程比 CF 过程更能固定 C。尽管来自 CL 的炭的 C/N 比低,表明炭的氮含量高,但来自 CL 的炭中的 C 主要来自木质素,表明来自 CL 的炭的分解将缓慢。为了通过炭的应用来固定 C,PLR 应该在受控过程中燃烧,而不是在田间燃烧。