• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

闪光视觉诱发电位由于正常受试者的变异性较大,作为 ICP 的标志物不可靠。

Flash visual evoked potentials are unreliable as markers of ICP due to high variability in normal subjects.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Jan;154(1):121-7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1152-9. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-011-1152-9
PMID:21959963
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous publications have suggested a high correlation between flash visual evoked potential (F-VEP) N2 peak latency and intracranial pressure. This would enable F-VEP to be used as a non-invasive and inexpensive method to estimate ICP in a number of settings. However, basic knowledge about variability across subjects and test-retest properties of the F-VEP is lacking.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy adult subjects were tested on three different occasions. F-VEP responses were recorded using international standards.

FINDINGS

For the tested population, mean N2 latency was 65.7 ms (SD 10.7 ms) and the range was 48-110 ms. Intra-individual variability was high, in four of the 15 subjects more than 15 ms between testing sessions. The same was found for P2 latency and for N2 and P2 amplitudes. The response waveform was very variable and unambiguous marking of peaks was often difficult. One out of the 15 subjects had a very poorly developed F-VEP response, but a normal pattern-reversal VEP response.

CONCLUSIONS

F-VEP has a wide range of latency, amplitude and waveform across normal subjects. A large proportion of subjects also had a high intra-individual variability over time. This variability makes F-VEPs unreliable as a marker for intracranial pressure, and caution in interpreting F-VEP changes in clinical work is advised.

摘要

背景

先前的出版物表明,闪光视觉诱发电位(F-VEP)N2 峰潜伏期与颅内压之间存在高度相关性。这将使 F-VEP 能够成为一种非侵入性且廉价的方法,在许多情况下用于估计 ICP。然而,关于受试者之间的变异性和 F-VEP 的测试-再测试特性的基本知识尚不清楚。

方法

15 名健康成年受试者在三个不同的时间点接受了测试。使用国际标准记录 F-VEP 反应。

结果

对于测试人群,N2 潜伏期的平均值为 65.7ms(SD 10.7ms),范围为 48-110ms。个体内变异性很高,在 15 名受试者中的 4 名中,测试之间的差异超过 15ms。P2 潜伏期以及 N2 和 P2 振幅也是如此。响应波形非常多变,峰的标记通常很困难。15 名受试者中的 1 名 F-VEP 反应非常不发达,但模式反转 VEP 反应正常。

结论

F-VEP 在正常受试者中具有广泛的潜伏期、幅度和波形。很大一部分受试者在时间上也存在很大的个体内变异性。这种变异性使得 F-VEP 作为颅内压的标志物不可靠,因此在临床工作中解释 F-VEP 变化时应谨慎。

相似文献

1
Flash visual evoked potentials are unreliable as markers of ICP due to high variability in normal subjects.闪光视觉诱发电位由于正常受试者的变异性较大,作为 ICP 的标志物不可靠。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Jan;154(1):121-7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1152-9. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
2
[Non-invasive detection for intracranial high pressure with FVEP picked-up by independent component analysis].[基于独立成分分析提取的FVEP对颅内高压进行无创检测]
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Oct;24(5):1015-8.
3
Effect of color of flash stimulus on variability of flash visual evoked potential latencies.闪光刺激颜色对闪光视觉诱发电位潜伏期变异性的影响。
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2012 Oct-Dec;56(4):322-9.
4
Visual evoked potentials show strong positive association with intracranial pressure in patients with cryptococcal meningitis.视觉诱发电位显示,隐球菌性脑膜炎患者的视觉诱发电位与颅内压呈强正相关。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015 Apr;73(4):309-13. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20150002. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
High test-retest reliability of checkerboard reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP) over 8 months.棋盘格翻转视觉诱发电位(VEP)在8个月内具有较高的重测信度。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;120(10):1835-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
6
Double function of noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring based on flash visual evoked potentials in unconscious patients with traumatic brain injury.基于闪光视觉诱发电位的无创颅内压监测在创伤性脑损伤昏迷患者中的双重作用。
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 May;27:63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.036. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
7
[Changes in visual evoked potentials in developmental age. Comparative studies of pattern reversal and two types of flash stimulation].[发育年龄视觉诱发电位的变化。图形翻转与两种闪光刺激的比较研究]
Przegl Lek. 2010;67(9):697-701.
8
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Single and Paired Flash Visual Evoked Potentials.经颅直流电刺激对单次和配对闪光视觉诱发电位的影响。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015 Jul;46(3):208-13. doi: 10.1177/1550059414539481. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
Effects of flash mode and intensity on P2 component latency and amplitude.闪光模式和强度对P2成分潜伏期及波幅的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2005 Mar;55(3):323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.09.005.
10
Attentional shifts have little effect on the waveform of the chromatic onset VEP.注意转移对视锥起始 VEP 的波形几乎没有影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Sep;30(5):525-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00747.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic dilemma of papilledema and pseudopapilledema.视乳头水肿和假性视乳头水肿的诊断难题。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 25;44(1):272. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03215-5.
2
Visual Evoked Potentials for the Detection of Diabetic Retinal Neuropathy.视觉诱发电位在糖尿病性视网膜神经病检测中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 17;24(8):7361. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087361.
3
Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.无创颅内压监测
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 13;12(6):2209. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062209.
4
Intracranial pressure monitoring in craniosynostosis.颅缝早闭中的颅内压监测
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):583-584. doi: 10.25259/JNRP-2022-6-41. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
5
A machine learning approach in the non-invasive prediction of intracranial pressure using Modified Photoplethysmography.基于改良光体积描记法的颅内压无创预测的机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0275417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275417. eCollection 2022.
6
Normocephalic sagittal craniosynostosis in young children is common and unrecognized.幼儿的正头颅矢状缝早闭很常见且未被识别。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Aug;38(8):1549-1556. doi: 10.1007/s00381-022-05533-4. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
7
Measuring Latency Variations in Evoked Potential Components Using a Simple Autocorrelation Technique.使用简单自相关技术测量诱发电位成分的潜伏期变化。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Sep 22;2021:8875445. doi: 10.1155/2021/8875445. eCollection 2021.
8
Detection of intracranial hypertension in children using optical coherence tomography: a systematic review.应用光学相干断层扫描技术检测儿童颅内高压:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 11;11(8):e046935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046935.
9
From head micro-motions towards CSF dynamics and non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring.从头部微运动到 CSF 动力学和无创颅内压监测。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93740-5.
10
Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring methods: a critical review.非侵入性颅内压监测方法:批判性评价。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2021 May;79(5):437-446. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0300.