Suppr超能文献

与 DSM-5 物质使用相关障碍标准制定相关的分析:3. 病理性赌博标准评估。

Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 3. An assessment of Pathological Gambling criteria.

机构信息

Addiction Psychiatry (Laboratoire de psychiatrie-CNRS USR 3413 SANPsy), Université Bordeaux Segalen, 121 rue de la Béchade, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Apr 1;122(1-2):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The DSM-5 Substance-Related Disorders Work Group proposed to include Pathological Gambling within the current Substance-Related Disorders section. The objective of the current report was to assess four possible sets of diagnostic criteria for Pathological Gambling.

METHODS

Gamblers (N=161) were defined as either Pathological or Non-Pathological according to four classification methods. (a) Option 1: the current DSM-IV criteria for Pathological Gambling; (b) Option 2: dropping the "Illegal Acts" criterion, while keeping the threshold at 5 required criteria endorsed; (c) Option 3: the proposed DSM-5 approach, i.e., deleting "Illegal Acts" and lowering the threshold of required criteria from 5 to 4; (d) Option 4: to use a set of Pathological Gambling criteria modeled on the DSM-IV Substance Dependence criteria. Cronbach's alpha and eigenvalues were calculated for reliability, Phi, discriminant function analyses, correlations and multivariate regression models were performed for validity and kappa coefficients were calculated for diagnostic consistency of each option.

RESULTS

All criteria sets were reliable and valid. Some criteria had higher discriminant properties than others.

CONCLUSION

The proposed DSM-5 criteria in Options 2 and 3 performed well and did not appear to alter the meanings of the diagnoses of Pathological Gambling from DSM-IV. Future work should further explore if Pathological Gambling might be assessed using the same criteria as those used for Substance Use Disorders.

摘要

背景

DSM-5 物质相关障碍工作组提议将病理性赌博纳入当前物质相关障碍部分。本报告的目的是评估病理性赌博的四个可能的诊断标准集。

方法

根据四种分类方法,将赌徒(N=161)定义为病理性或非病理性。(a)选项 1:当前 DSM-IV 病理性赌博标准;(b)选项 2:删除“非法行为”标准,同时保持 5 个必需标准的阈值不变;(c)选项 3:DSM-5 方法,即删除“非法行为”,将必需标准的阈值从 5 降低到 4;(d)选项 4:使用一组基于 DSM-IV 物质依赖标准建模的病理性赌博标准。为了可靠性,计算了克朗巴赫的 alpha 和特征值;为了有效性,进行了 Phi、判别函数分析、相关性和多元回归模型;为了每个选项的诊断一致性,计算了kappa 系数。

结果

所有标准集都是可靠和有效的。有些标准比其他标准具有更高的判别性能。

结论

选项 2 和 3 中的提议 DSM-5 标准表现良好,似乎并未改变 DSM-IV 中病理性赌博诊断的含义。未来的工作应进一步探讨是否可以使用与物质使用障碍相同的标准来评估病理性赌博。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验