Suppr超能文献

赌博障碍识别测试的制定:一项国际德尔菲法和共识研究的结果。

Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Stockholm Region Health Services, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;30(2):e1865. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1865. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Diverse instruments are used to measure problem gambling and Gambling Disorder intervention outcomes. The 2004 Banff consensus agreement proposed necessary features for reporting gambling treatment efficacy. To address the challenge of including these features in a single instrument, a process was initiated to develop the Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT), as an instrument analogous to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test.

METHODS

Gambling experts from 10 countries participated in an international two-round Delphi (n = 61; n = 30), rating 30 items proposed for inclusion in the GDIT. Gambling researchers and clinicians from several countries participated in three consensus meetings (n = 10; n = 4; n = 3). User feedback was obtained from individuals with experience of problem gambling (n = 12) and from treatment-seekers with Gambling Disorder (n = 8).

RESULTS

Ten items fulfilled Delphi consensus criteria for inclusion in the GDIT (M ≥ 7 on a scale of 1-9 in the second round). Item-related issues were addressed, and four more items were added to conform to the Banff agreement recommendations, yielding a final draft version of the GDIT with 14 items in three domains: gambling behavior, gambling symptoms and negative consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established preliminary construct and face validity for the GDIT.

摘要

目的

用于测量赌博问题和赌博障碍干预结果的工具多种多样。2004 年班夫共识协议提出了报告赌博治疗效果的必要特征。为了应对在单一工具中包含这些特征的挑战,启动了开发赌博障碍识别测试(GDIT)的过程,该测试类似于酒精使用障碍识别测试和药物使用障碍识别测试。

方法

来自 10 个国家的赌博专家参加了国际两轮 Delphi 研究(n = 61;n = 30),对拟纳入 GDIT 的 30 项内容进行了评分。来自多个国家的赌博研究人员和临床医生参加了三次共识会议(n = 10;n = 4;n = 3)。具有赌博问题经验的个人(n = 12)和寻求赌博障碍治疗的个体(n = 8)提供了用户反馈。

结果

10 项内容满足纳入 GDIT 的 Delphi 共识标准(第二轮得分为 1-9 分的 7 分及以上)。解决了与项目相关的问题,并添加了另外 4 项内容,以符合班夫协议的建议,最终草稿版 GDIT 包含三个领域的 14 个项目:赌博行为、赌博症状和负面后果。

结论

本研究为 GDIT 建立了初步的结构和表面有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d575/8170582/c061a9bbb551/MPR-30-e1865-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验