• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SWL 治疗下盏结石:儿童与成人治疗效果评估。

SWL in lower calyceal calculi: evaluation of the treatment results in children and adults.

机构信息

Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.005
PMID:21962877
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the treatment parameters of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in lower calyceal calculi in adults and children in a comparative manner.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2011, SWL was performed for lower calyceal calculi in 282 adults (mean age 48.5 years, range 28-64) and 54 children (mean age 48 months, range 5-141). The Wolf Piezolith 3000 lithotriptor has been used for SWL. Success rates, auxiliary procedures, additional interventions, and complications were evaluated in detail in a comparative manner.

RESULTS

Mean stone size was 7.7 mm (range 5-25) and 8.1 mm (range 5-23) in children and in adults, respectively. Mean SWL sessions were 1.5 (range 1-5) in children and 2.4 (range 1-6) in adults. Although 66.6% of children were stone-free after the first session, 28% of adult patients were stone-free after the first SWL session, showing a statistically significant difference (P = .0001). After the treatments, although a complete stone-free status was obtained in 85% of children, 31.5% of adults were stone-free at 3-month follow-up after SWL (P = .0001). Although no auxiliary procedures were needed in children, 8.2% of adults required them. Likewise, the percentage of additional procedures were higher in adults than children (20.2%).

CONCLUSION

SWL for lower calyceal calculi has been found to be highly successful in pediatric patients. These results demonstrate that, irrespective of stone size, SWL should be the first treatment alternative in the management of lower calyx stones in children.

摘要

目的

以对比的方式评估成年人和儿童的冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗参数。

材料和方法

在 2006 年至 2011 年间,对 282 例成年人(平均年龄 48.5 岁,范围 28-64 岁)和 54 例儿童(平均年龄 48 个月,范围 5-141 岁)的下盏结石进行了 SWL。采用 Wolf Piezolith 3000 碎石机进行 SWL。以对比的方式详细评估成功率、辅助程序、额外干预和并发症。

结果

儿童和成年人的平均结石大小分别为 7.7mm(范围 5-25)和 8.1mm(范围 5-23)。儿童 SWL 次数平均为 1.5 次(范围 1-5),成年人平均为 2.4 次(范围 1-6)。尽管 66.6%的儿童在第一次治疗后结石完全消失,但 28%的成年患者在第一次 SWL 后结石完全消失,差异有统计学意义(P=0.0001)。治疗后,尽管 85%的儿童结石完全消失,但 3 个月随访时 31.5%的成年患者结石完全消失(P=0.0001)。尽管儿童不需要辅助程序,但 8.2%的成年患者需要。同样,成人的附加程序百分比高于儿童(20.2%)。

结论

SWL 治疗下盏结石在儿科患者中非常成功。这些结果表明,无论结石大小如何,SWL 都应成为儿童下盏结石治疗的首选方法。

相似文献

1
SWL in lower calyceal calculi: evaluation of the treatment results in children and adults.SWL 治疗下盏结石:儿童与成人治疗效果评估。
Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
2
The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.肾盂肾盏解剖结构对小儿下极结石冲击波碎石术后结石清除的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1082-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135670.83076.5c.
3
Comparative results of shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices.冲击波碎石术治疗肾上、中、下盏肾结石的对比结果。
J Endourol. 2007 Sep;21(9):951-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0275.
4
Results of shockwave lithotripsy for pediatric urolithiasis.小儿尿路结石的冲击波碎石术结果
J Endourol. 2004 Aug;18(6):527-30. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.527.
5
Obesity might not be a disadvantage for SWL treatment in children with renal stone.肥胖可能不是儿童肾结石 SWL 治疗的劣势。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Feb;45(1):11-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0368-9. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
6
Kidney stone size and hounsfield units predict successful shockwave lithotripsy in children.肾结石大小和豪斯菲尔德单位预测儿童冲击波碎石术的成功。
Urology. 2013 Apr;81(4):880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
7
Lower calyceal and renal pelvic stones in preschool children: A comparative study of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.学龄前儿童下盏及肾盂结石:微创经皮肾镜取石术与体外冲击波碎石术的对比研究
Int J Urol. 2016 Jul;23(7):564-70. doi: 10.1111/iju.13093. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and microperc for treatment of kidney stones in children.比较冲击波碎石术和微经皮肾镜取石术治疗儿童肾结石。
J Endourol. 2013 Sep;27(9):1141-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0066. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
9
Lower pole midsize (1-2 cm) calyceal stones: outcome analysis of 56 cases.下极中型(1 - 2厘米)肾盏结石:56例病例的结果分析
Urol Int. 2012;89(3):348-54. doi: 10.1159/000341557. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
10
Does child's age affect interval to stone-free status after SWL? A critical analysis.儿童年龄对 SWL 后结石无残留状态的时间间隔有影响吗?一项批判性分析。
Urology. 2012 May;79(5):1138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Combined Therapy in Children: Efficacy and Long-Term Results.儿童体外冲击波碎石术及联合治疗:疗效与长期结果
Front Pediatr. 2021 May 13;9:609664. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.609664. eCollection 2021.
2
The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗小儿尿路结石的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0757-5. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
3
The glue-clot technique: a new technique description for small calyceal stone fragments removal.
胶水凝块技术:一种用于清除小盏结石碎片的新技术描述。
Urolithiasis. 2014 Oct;42(5):441-4. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0679-7. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
4
Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score for retrograde intrarenal surgery.用于逆行性肾内手术的改良首尔国立大学肾结石复杂性评分
Urolithiasis. 2014 Aug;42(4):335-40. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0650-7. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: An opinion on its future.体外冲击波碎石术:对其未来的看法。
Indian J Urol. 2014 Jan;30(1):73-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.124211.
6
Is tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy a feasible technique for the treatment of staghorn calculi?无管经皮肾镜取石术是治疗鹿角形结石的可行技术吗?
Korean J Urol. 2013 Oct;54(10):693-6. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.10.693. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
7
Factors affecting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for unilateral urinary stones in children: a 17-year single-institute experience.影响儿童单侧尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的因素:一项17年单中心经验
Korean J Urol. 2013 Jul;54(7):460-6. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.7.460. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
8
[Urolithiasis in childhood].[儿童期尿路结石]
Urologe A. 2013 Aug;52(8):1084-91. doi: 10.1007/s00120-013-3165-x.