Suppr超能文献

外卖食品消费对水果和蔬菜摄入量社会经济差异的影响:一项中介分析。

Contribution of take-out food consumption to socioeconomic differences in fruit and vegetable intake: a mediation analysis.

作者信息

Miura Kyoko, Giskes Katrina, Turrell Gavin

机构信息

School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology,Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059 Australia.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Oct;111(10):1556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.009.

Abstract

Lower fruit and vegetable (F/V) intake among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups has been well documented, and may be a consequence of a higher consumption of take-out foods. This study examined whether, and to what extent, take-out food consumption mediated (explained) the association between socioeconomic position and F/V intake. A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted among 1,500 randomly selected adults aged 25 to 64 years in Brisbane, Australia, during 2009 (response rate 63.7%, N=903). A food frequency questionnaire assessed usual daily servings of F/V (0 to 6), overall take-out consumption (times per week), and the consumption of 22 specific take-out items (never to once per day or more). These specific take-out items were grouped into "less healthy" and "healthy" choices and indexes were created for each type of choice (0 to 100). Socioeconomic position was ascertained by education. The analyses were performed using linear regression, and a bootstrap resampling approach estimated the statistical significance of the mediated effects. Mean daily servings of F/V were 1.89±1.05 and 2.47±1.12, respectively. The least educated group members were more likely to consume fewer servings of fruit (β= -.39, P<0.001) and vegetables (β= -.43, P<0.001) compared with members of the highest educated group. The consumption of "less healthy" take-out food partly explained (mediated) education differences in F/V intake; however, no mediating effects were observed for overall and "healthy" take-out consumption. Regular consumption of "less healthy" take-out items may contribute to socioeconomic differences in F/V intake, possibly by displacing these foods.

摘要

社会经济弱势群体中果蔬摄入量较低已有充分记录,这可能是外卖食品消费较高的结果。本研究调查了外卖食品消费是否以及在多大程度上介导(解释)了社会经济地位与果蔬摄入量之间的关联。2009年,在澳大利亚布里斯班对1500名年龄在25至64岁之间的成年人进行了横断面邮政调查(回复率63.7%,N = 903)。一份食物频率问卷评估了通常每日的果蔬摄入量(0至6份)、总体外卖消费情况(每周次数)以及22种特定外卖食品的消费情况(从不食用至每天一次或更多)。这些特定外卖食品被分为“不太健康”和“健康”两类选择,并为每种选择类型创建了指数(0至100)。通过教育程度确定社会经济地位。使用线性回归进行分析,并采用自抽样重抽样方法估计介导效应的统计学意义。果蔬的平均每日摄入量分别为1.89±1.05份和2.47±1.12份。与受教育程度最高的群体成员相比,受教育程度最低的群体成员摄入水果(β = -0.39,P < 0.001)和蔬菜(β = -0.43,P < 0.001)的份数更少。“不太健康”的外卖食品消费部分解释(介导)了果蔬摄入量方面的教育差异;然而,未观察到总体外卖消费和“健康”外卖消费的介导效应。经常食用“不太健康”的外卖食品可能导致果蔬摄入量的社会经济差异,可能是通过取代这些食物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验