Carlson R W, Borrison R A, Sher H B, Eisenberg P D, Mowry P A, Wolin E M
Department of Medicine, Stanford University, California.
Pharmacotherapy. 1990;10(3):211-6.
Seventy-five patients with moderate to severe cancer pain were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive first-dose ketorolac tromethamine 10 mg orally, acetaminophen 600 mg plus codeine 60 mg orally, or placebo, followed by subsequent doses of ketorolac or acetaminophen plus codeine four times daily for 7 days. Patient characteristics were similar among the treatment groups. The first-dose observation documented that both ketorolac and acetaminophen plus codeine produced an equivalent reduction in cancer pain and were superior to placebo as measured by pain intensity differences and pain relief. Multidose comparison documented a small but statistically significant advantage in mean daily pain relief favoring acetaminophen plus codeine, although there were no differences in mean daily ratings of overall effects for either study medication. Adverse symptoms were acceptable with both ketorolac and acetaminophen plus codeine. We conclude that ketorolac has significant analgesic activity in patients with cancer pain, although its precise role in the treatment regimen of these patients remains undefined.
75例中重度癌痛患者被随机双盲分组,分别口服首剂10mg酮咯酸氨丁三醇、600mg对乙酰氨基酚加60mg可待因或安慰剂,随后酮咯酸或对乙酰氨基酚加可待因每日4次给药,共7天。各治疗组患者特征相似。首剂观察表明,酮咯酸和对乙酰氨基酚加可待因在减轻癌痛方面效果相当,且在疼痛强度差异和疼痛缓解方面均优于安慰剂。多剂量比较显示,对乙酰氨基酚加可待因在平均每日疼痛缓解方面有微小但具有统计学意义的优势,不过两种研究药物在总体效果的平均每日评分上并无差异。酮咯酸和对乙酰氨基酚加可待因的不良反应均可接受。我们得出结论,酮咯酸在癌痛患者中具有显著的镇痛活性,尽管其在这些患者治疗方案中的确切作用仍不明确。