Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine II, DRK-Hospital Neuwied, Neuwied, Germany.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018 Dec;9(7):1235-1254. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12352. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Non-opioid analgesics are widely used for pain relief in palliative medicine. However, there is a lack of evidence-based recommendations addressing the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of non-opioids in this field. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on current evidence can provide a basis for sound recommendations in clinical practice. A database search for controlled trials on the use of non-opioids in adult palliative patients was performed in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE from inception to 18 February 2018. Endpoints were pain intensity, opioid-sparing effects, safety, and quality of life. Studies with similar patients, interventions, and outcomes were included in the meta-analyses. Our systematic search was able to only identify studies dealing with cancer pain. Of 5991 retrieved studies, 43 could be included (n = 2925 patients). There was no convincing evidence for satisfactory pain relief by acetaminophen alone or in combination with strong opioids. We found substantial evidence of moderate quality for a satisfactory pain relief in cancer by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), flupirtine, and dipyrone compared with placebo or other analgesics. There was no evidence for a superiority of one specific non-opioid. There was moderate quality of evidence for a similar pain reduction by NSAIDs in the usual dosage range compared with up to 15 mg of morphine or opioids of equianalgesic potency. The combination of NSAID and step III opioids showed a beneficial effect, without a decreased tolerability. There is scarce evidence concerning the combination of NSAIDs with weak opioids. There are no randomized-controlled studies on the use of non-opioids in a wide range of end-stage diseases except for cancer. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, flupirtine, and dipyrone can be recommended for the treatment of cancer pain either alone or in combination with strong opioids. The use of acetaminophen in the palliative setting cannot be recommended. Studies are not available for long-term use. There is a lack of evidence regarding pain treatment by non-opioids in specific cancer entities.
非阿片类镇痛药在姑息治疗中被广泛用于缓解疼痛。然而,在该领域,针对非阿片类药物的疗效、耐受性和安全性,缺乏基于证据的推荐意见。对当前证据进行全面的系统评价和荟萃分析,可以为临床实践中的合理推荐提供依据。我们在 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 EMBASE 中检索了截至 2018 年 2 月 18 日关于非阿片类药物在成年姑息治疗患者中应用的对照试验,检索词包括“palliative care”“non-opioid analgesics”和“randomized controlled trials”。终点为疼痛强度、阿片类药物节省作用、安全性和生活质量。将具有相似患者、干预措施和结局的研究纳入荟萃分析。我们的系统检索仅能确定处理癌症疼痛的研究。在 5991 项检索到的研究中,有 43 项研究(n=2925 例患者)符合纳入标准。单独使用或与强阿片类药物联合使用扑热息痛不能令人满意地缓解疼痛,这一结论并无充分证据支持。我们发现,与安慰剂或其他镇痛药相比,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、氟吡汀和双氯芬酸在治疗癌症疼痛方面有令人满意的疗效,证据质量为中等。没有证据表明一种特定的非阿片类药物具有优势。在常用剂量范围内,与 15mg 吗啡或等效镇痛作用的阿片类药物相比,NSAIDs 可减轻疼痛,这一结论具有中等质量的证据。NSAID 与阿片类药物(III 步)联合使用具有有益效果,且不会降低耐受性。关于 NSAID 与弱阿片类药物联合使用的证据很少。除癌症外,目前尚无关于非阿片类药物在广泛的终末期疾病中的应用的随机对照研究。非甾体抗炎药、氟吡汀和双氯芬酸可单独使用或与强阿片类药物联合用于治疗癌症疼痛。在姑息治疗中,扑热息痛不能被推荐使用。目前尚无长期使用的研究。关于非阿片类药物在特定癌症实体中的疼痛治疗,缺乏证据。