University of Texas at Arlington, 76019-0377, USA.
Am Psychol. 2011 Oct;66(7):645. doi: 10.1037/a0024841.
The author read with interest, and concern, the January 2011 issue of the American Psychologist. The Special Issue on Comprehensive Soldier Fitness addressed a hugely consequential national issue and offered a vision for psychological resilience along with an elaborate set of supporting articles, concluding with some comments on "Objections" to psychologists working with the military. While a bold vision was offered and a game plan presented, no data or evidence are yet available (it is far too early in the process), and that should concern us all. The author hopes the American Psychological Association (APA) and the American Psychologist offer skeptical and critical views in future issues on the issue of the psychological health of our military and as evidence emerges regarding the Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program.
作者饶有兴致地阅读了 2011 年 1 月的《美国心理学家》杂志。该期的特别专题聚焦于“全面军人适应力”，讨论了一个极具重要意义的全国性问题，并为心理适应力提供了一个愿景，同时还附有一系列精心编写的相关文章，最后对“反对心理学家为军队服务”这一观点进行了点评。虽然该专题提出了一个大胆的设想并制定了一个实施计划，但目前尚无数据或证据（整个进程还处于早期阶段），这应该引起我们所有人的关注。作者希望美国心理协会（APA）和《美国心理学家》杂志在未来的刊物中对军队心理健康问题提供怀疑和批评的观点，并在有关“全面军人适应力”计划的证据出现时予以关注。
