• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国医疗保健委托服务:一个不断发展的故事。

Commissioning health care in England: an evolving story.

机构信息

Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):465-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00009.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00009
PMID:21969345
Abstract

The general election in the United Kingdom in May 2010 resulted in the election of a new government, a coalition between Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties. Six weeks after the election, a white paper, "Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS," that proposed profound changes to the structure and organization of the health service was published. The change that generated the most discussion was the proposal that general practitioners be placed at the center of the system and given control of about 80% of the National Health Service's £100 billion budget. The proposals were greeted with considerable concern by many health care professionals, patient representatives, and the media. In response, the government organized an independent review, and proposals have been altered in response. This article outlines the current organization of the National Health Service, the rationale for change, and government proposals.

摘要

2010 年 5 月,英国举行大选,保守党和自由民主党联合组阁,新政府上台。大选结束六周后,发布了一份题为“公平与卓越:解放国民保健制度”的白皮书,提议对卫生服务的结构和组织进行深刻变革。其中最受关注的一项变革是建议将家庭医生置于体系的中心位置,并让他们控制国民保健制度约 1000 亿英镑预算中的 80%。这些提议引起了许多医疗保健专业人员、患者代表和媒体的极大关注。为此,政府组织了一次独立审查,相关提议也进行了调整。本文概述了国民保健制度的现行组织架构、变革的基本原理以及政府的提议。

相似文献

1
Commissioning health care in England: an evolving story.英国医疗保健委托服务:一个不断发展的故事。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):465-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00009.
2
Evaluating the Labour Government's English NHS health system reforms: the 2008 Darzi reforms.评估工党政府对英国国民医疗服务体系的改革:2008年的达兹改革
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013 Oct;18(2 Suppl):1-10. doi: 10.1177/1355819613499323.
3
The commissioning reforms in the English National Health Service and their potential impact on primary care.英国国民医疗服务体系中的委托改革及其对初级医疗保健的潜在影响。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Jul-Sep;35(3):192-9. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31823e838f.
4
Liberating the NHS? Implications of the new White paper.解放国民医疗服务体系?新白皮书的影响
J Fam Health Care. 2010;20(5):148-9.
5
United Kingdom (England): Health system review.英国(英格兰):卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(1):1-483, xix-xx.
6
All change for the NHS in England as legislation takes effect.随着立法生效,英格兰国民医疗服务体系发生了全面变革。
Lancet. 2013 Apr 6;381(9873):1169-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60783-7.
7
Integrated health and social care in England--Progress and prospects.英国的综合健康与社会护理——进展与前景。
Health Policy. 2015 Jul;119(7):856-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 May 6.
8
Liberating the NHS; commissioning, outsourcing and a new politics debate.解放国民医疗服务体系;委托、外包与一场新的政治辩论。
Br J Community Nurs. 2010 Oct;15(10):503-5. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2010.15.10.78746.
9
Commissioning advocate resigns after becoming disillusioned with what GPs are being asked to do.委托倡导者在对全科医生被要求做的事情感到失望后辞职。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 11;345:e6133. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6133.
10
General practitioner commissioning consortia and budgetary risk: evidence from the modelling of 'fair share' practice budgets for mental health.全科医生委托联盟与预算风险:精神健康“公平份额”实践预算建模的证据。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Apr;16(2):95-101. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.010086.

引用本文的文献

1
Morality and markets in the NHS.NHS 中的道德与市场。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Nov 16;3(7):371-6. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.123. eCollection 2014 Dec.
2
Feasibility study of geospatial mapping of chronic disease risk to inform public health commissioning.慢性病风险的地理空间映射对公共卫生委托的可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 15;2(1):e000711. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000711. Print 2012.