• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《如何与精神科医生交谈》:精神分裂症住院患者的共同决策培训。

"How to speak to your psychiatrist": shared decision-making training for inpatients with schizophrenia.

机构信息

Psychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich , Germany.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Oct;62(10):1218-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.10.pss6210_1218.

DOI:10.1176/ps.62.10.pss6210_1218
PMID:21969650
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Involving patients with mental illness in shared decision making about their treatment has recently attracted attention, but existing interventions may insufficiently motivate or enable patients with schizophrenia to behave more actively. This study evaluated a new intervention.

METHODS

In a pilot study 61 inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from a psychiatric hospital in Germany were randomly assigned to receive shared decision-making training (N=32) or cognitive training (N=29, control condition).

RESULTS

The shared decision-making training yielded higher participation preferences and increased patients' desire to have more responsibility in treatment decisions, which continued to the six-month follow-up. Patients in the intervention group became more skeptical of treatment and were perceived as more "difficult" by their psychiatrists.

CONCLUSIONS

Training in shared decision making was highly accepted by patients and changed attitudes toward participation in decision making. There were some hints that it might generate beneficial long-term effects.

摘要

目的

让患有精神疾病的患者参与到治疗决策中,这一话题最近引起了广泛关注。然而,现有的干预措施可能并不能充分激发或使精神分裂症患者更积极地参与。本研究评估了一种新的干预措施。

方法

在一项试点研究中,德国一家精神病院的 61 名精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍住院患者被随机分配接受共享决策制定培训(n=32)或认知训练(n=29,对照组)。

结果

共享决策制定培训产生了更高的参与偏好,并增加了患者在治疗决策中承担更多责任的愿望,这种愿望持续到了六个月的随访期。干预组的患者对治疗更加怀疑,并且被他们的精神科医生认为更“难”。

结论

共享决策制定培训受到患者的高度接受,并改变了他们对参与决策的态度。有一些迹象表明,它可能会产生有益的长期效果。

相似文献

1
"How to speak to your psychiatrist": shared decision-making training for inpatients with schizophrenia.《如何与精神科医生交谈》:精神分裂症住院患者的共同决策培训。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Oct;62(10):1218-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.10.pss6210_1218.
2
Training patients with schizophrenia to share decisions with their psychiatrists: a randomized-controlled trial.训练精神分裂症患者与精神科医生共同做出决策:一项随机对照试验。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;52(2):175-182. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1327-z. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
3
Shared decision making PLUS - a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).共享决策制定增强版——一项针对精神分裂症住院患者的整群随机试验(SDM-PLUS)。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1240-3.
4
Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).在急性精神病病房实施共享决策:一项伴有精神分裂症患者的(SDM-PLUS)集群随机试验。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Jun 16;29:e137. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000505.
5
Why do some patients with schizophrenia want to be engaged in medical decision making and others do not?为什么有些精神分裂症患者希望参与医疗决策,而有些患者则不希望?
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;72(12):1636-43. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06119yel. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
6
Self-Stigma and Consumer Participation in Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Services.自我污名与消费者参与心理健康服务中的共同决策
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Aug 1;68(8):783-788. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600282. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
7
How do patients from eastern and western Germany compare with regard to their preferences for shared decision making?德国东西部的患者在共同决策偏好方面有何不同?
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Aug;22(4):469-73. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr112. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
Does it matter whether physicians' recommendations are given early or late in the decision-making process? An experimental study among patients with schizophrenia.医生的建议在决策过程中给出的早晚有关系吗?一项针对精神分裂症患者的实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 16;6(9):e011282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011282.
9
Shared decision making and long-term outcome in schizophrenia treatment.精神分裂症治疗中的共同决策与长期疗效
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;68(7):992-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0703.
10
Psychiatrists' use of shared decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia: patient characteristics and decision topics.精神科医生在精神分裂症治疗中运用共同决策:患者特征与决策主题
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Aug;60(8):1107-12. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.8.1107.

引用本文的文献

1
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living With Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review (Part 2-Designing SDM Interventions: Optimizing Design and Local Implementation).从理想主义者到现实主义者——为精神病患者抗精神病药物处方选择设计并实施共享决策干预措施(SHAPE):一项现实主义综述(第2部分——设计共享决策干预措施:优化设计与本地实施)
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):932-948. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf059.
2
Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:对精神疾病患者结局证据的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70134. doi: 10.1111/hex.70134.
3
Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:当前证据及实施障碍的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14001. doi: 10.1111/hex.14001.
4
Identifying the mechanisms of patient-centred communication in secure messages between clinicians and cancer patients.识别临床医生与癌症患者之间安全信息中以患者为中心的沟通机制。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 8;2:100161. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100161. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Trends, challenges, and priorities for shared decision making in mental health: The first umbrella review.精神健康领域共享决策的趋势、挑战和优先事项:首项伞式综述。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;69(4):823-840. doi: 10.1177/00207640221140291. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry: Dissolving the Responsibility Problem.精神病学中的共同决策:解决责任问题。
Health Care Anal. 2023 Jun;31(2):65-80. doi: 10.1007/s10728-022-00451-7. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
7
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
8
Are shared decision making studies well enough described to be replicated? Secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.共享决策研究的描述是否充分到足以被复制?一项考科蓝系统评价的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0265401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265401. eCollection 2022.
9
Patient Perceived Involvement in Their Treatment is Influenced by Factors Other Than Independently Rated Clinician Communication Effectiveness.患者对自身治疗的感知参与度受到独立评估的临床医生沟通效果以外的因素影响。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Dec 8;8:23743735211065261. doi: 10.1177/23743735211065261. eCollection 2021.
10
Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.决策辅导:帮助人们做出医疗决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013385.pub2.