Detection of pulmonary nodules by C-arm CT using a phantom lung: comparison with CT.

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of detection of lung nodules by C-arm CT (CACT) is important before this procedure can be used to guide percutaneous lung interventions.

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of CACT with CT in the detection of pulmonary nodules using a phantom lung.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A phantom lung containing 12 phantom nodules in four sizes (5 mm/8 mm/10 mm/12 mm) and three CT values (one solid nodule, +100 HU; two ground glass nodules, -630 and -800 HU) was used. Six sessions of CACT (slice thickness 4.5 mm) and CT (slice thickness 5 mm) were performed. In each session, the locations of nodules were arbitrarily changed in the phantom. Three radiologists assessed the detection of a total of 72 nodules. Statistical analysis was performed for the sensitivity and positive predictive value of lung nodules between CACT and CT by the McNemar test and paired t-test (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Sensitivity did not differ between CACT and CT, respectively (reader 1, 82% vs. 88%, P = 0.22; reader 2, 82% vs. 78%, P = 0.37; reader 3, 79% vs. 83%, P = 0.48). For nodules of 8 mm or larger, the sensitivity increased for each reader and showed no significant difference between CACT vs. CT. The positive predictive value did not differ between CACT and CT.

CONCLUSION

In this phantom study, CT and CACT show similar sensitivity for the detection of pulmonary nodules. CACT could be used in percutaneous interventional procedures in the lungs.