• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辩论:腹主动脉瘤手术是否应集中在高容量中心进行。

Debate: whether abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery should be centralized at higher-volume centers.

机构信息

St. George's Vascular Institute, St. George's, NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.064.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.064
PMID:21971095
Abstract

Volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery have become increasingly relevant in recent years. At the individual surgeon level, increased experience has been linked with improved patient outcomes after volume-outcome and learning curve analyses. At the hospital level, further analyses have generally shown a similar relationship linking the busier hospitals with improved outcomes. However, is this relationship sufficient and robust enough to support important health care delivery decisions regarding centralization of care? In England, such information has helped to shape the vascular surgery reorganization process in London. The following discussion presents the advantages and disadvantages of the practical use of such information.

摘要

近年来,血管外科学中的量效关系变得越来越重要。在个体外科医生层面,通过量效和学习曲线分析,经验的增加与患者预后的改善相关。在医院层面,进一步的分析通常表明,与较繁忙的医院相关的类似关系可以改善结果。然而,这种关系是否足够充分和稳健,足以支持有关护理集中化的重要医疗服务决策?在英国,此类信息有助于塑造伦敦的血管外科学重组过程。以下讨论介绍了实用此类信息的优缺点。

相似文献

1
Debate: whether abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery should be centralized at higher-volume centers.辩论:腹主动脉瘤手术是否应集中在高容量中心进行。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.064.
2
Centralization harnessing volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery and aortic aneurysm care should not focus solely on threshold operative caseload.在血管外科手术和主动脉瘤护理中利用手术量-预后关系进行集中化管理不应仅关注阈值手术病例数量。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Oct;44(7):556-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574410375130. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
3
Editors' commentary.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1214. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.065.
4
Surgeon case volume, not institution case volume, is the primary determinant of in-hospital mortality after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.外科医生手术量而非机构手术量是择期开放腹主动脉瘤修复术后院内死亡率的主要决定因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):591-599.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.063. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
5
The impact of hospital volume on the development of infectious complications after elective abdominal aortic surgery in the Medicare population.医院手术量对医疗保险人群择期腹主动脉手术后感染性并发症发生情况的影响。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011 May;45(4):317-24. doi: 10.1177/1538574411403167.
6
Provision of vascular surgery in England in 2012.2012 年英格兰的血管外科学服务提供情况。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;45(1):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
7
Determination of patient preference for location of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.确定患者对择期腹主动脉瘤手术地点的偏好。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 May;47(4):288-93. doi: 10.1177/1538574413485648. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
8
Volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery: the current status.血管外科学中的量效关系:现状。
J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;17(3):356-65. doi: 10.1583/10-3035.1.
9
Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.衡量关键指标:机构结局数据优于使用替代指标来定义腹主动脉瘤修复的“卓越中心”。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
10
Provider volume and outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, and lower extremity revascularization procedures.腹主动脉瘤修复、颈动脉内膜切除术和下肢血管重建手术的医疗服务提供者数量及治疗结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;45(3):615-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.019.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of centralization of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair procedures on perioperative outcomes.腹主动脉瘤修复手术集中化对围手术期结局的影响。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(Suppl 3):S125. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.71.
2
Use of an Assistant Surgeon Does not Mitigate the Effect of Lead Surgeon Volume on Outcomes Following Open Repair of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.使用助理外科医生并不能减轻主刀外科医生手术量对开放修复完整腹主动脉瘤术后结果的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 May;55(5):714-719. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
3
National trends in open surgical, endovascular, and branched-fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare patients.
医疗保险患者中行开放手术、血管内和分支开窗血管内主动脉瘤修复术的国家趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jun;67(6):1690-1697.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.046. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Reporting individual surgeon outcomes does not lead to risk aversion in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.报告个体外科医生的手术结果并不会导致腹主动脉瘤手术中的风险规避。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Feb;99(2):161-165. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0005. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Minimum volume standards in German hospitals: do they get along with procedure centralization? A retrospective longitudinal data analysis.德国医院的最小容量标准:它们与手术集中化兼容吗?一项回顾性纵向数据分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 22;15:279. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0944-7.
6
Towards national surgical surveillance in the UK--a pilot study.英国国家外科手术监测研究——一项试点研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e47969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047969. Epub 2012 Dec 11.