• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定患者对择期腹主动脉瘤手术地点的偏好。

Determination of patient preference for location of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

作者信息

Landau John H, Novick Teresa V, Dubois Luc, Power Adam H, Harris Jeremy R, Derose Guy, Forbes Thomas L

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre & Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 May;47(4):288-93. doi: 10.1177/1538574413485648. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1177/1538574413485648
PMID:23579366
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aneurysm repair is centralized in higher volume centers resulting in reduced mortality, with longer travel distances. The purpose of this study is to explore patients' preference between local care versus longer distances and lower mortality rates.

METHODS

Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) measuring 4 to 5 cm and living at least a 1-hour drive from our hospital were asked to assume it had grown to 5.5 cm, and repair was recommended with a mortality risk of 2%. The level of additional risk they would accept to undergo surgery locally was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were surveyed. If mortality risk was equivalent at the local and regional hospitals, 44% preferred care at our tertiary center, while 56% preferred surgery locally. If perioperative mortality was increased at the local hospital, 9% preferred local surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients with AAA will accept longer travel distances for care as long as it results in a reduction in perioperative mortality.

摘要

目的

动脉瘤修复手术集中于手术量较大的中心可降低死亡率,但患者就诊距离会更远。本研究旨在探讨患者在本地治疗与更远距离及更低死亡率之间的偏好。

方法

对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)直径为4至5厘米且居住在距离我院至少1小时车程处的患者,假设其动脉瘤已增大至5.5厘米,并建议进行修复手术,手术死亡率风险为2%。确定他们为在本地接受手术愿意额外承担的风险水平。

结果

共调查了67例患者。如果本地和区域医院的死亡率风险相当,44%的患者倾向于在我们的三级中心接受治疗,而56%的患者倾向于在本地进行手术。如果本地医院围手术期死亡率增加,9%的患者倾向于在本地进行手术。

结论

绝大多数腹主动脉瘤患者会接受更长的就诊距离,只要这能降低围手术期死亡率。

相似文献

1
Determination of patient preference for location of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.确定患者对择期腹主动脉瘤手术地点的偏好。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 May;47(4):288-93. doi: 10.1177/1538574413485648. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
2
Provision of vascular surgery in England in 2012.2012 年英格兰的血管外科学服务提供情况。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;45(1):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
3
Reduction of in-hospital mortality among California hospitals meeting Leapfrog evidence-based standards for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.加利福尼亚州符合腹主动脉瘤修复循证标准的医院,其院内死亡率降低。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1155-6; discussion 1163-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.021.
4
Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.衡量关键指标:机构结局数据优于使用替代指标来定义腹主动脉瘤修复的“卓越中心”。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
5
Surgeon case volume, not institution case volume, is the primary determinant of in-hospital mortality after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.外科医生手术量而非机构手术量是择期开放腹主动脉瘤修复术后院内死亡率的主要决定因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):591-599.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.063. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
6
Debate: whether abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery should be centralized at higher-volume centers.辩论:腹主动脉瘤手术是否应集中在高容量中心进行。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.064.
7
The impact of hospital volume on the development of infectious complications after elective abdominal aortic surgery in the Medicare population.医院手术量对医疗保险人群择期腹主动脉手术后感染性并发症发生情况的影响。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011 May;45(4):317-24. doi: 10.1177/1538574411403167.
8
Improving results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a low-volume hospital by risk-adjusted selection of treatment in the endovascular era.在血管内治疗时代,通过风险调整后的治疗选择来提高低容量医院择期腹主动脉瘤修复的效果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Sep;32(5):918-22. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9538-2. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
9
The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German hospitals.131家德国医院择期开放性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术后容量与预后的关系。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;34(3):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
10
Effect of endovascular aneurysm repair on the volume-outcome relationship in aneurysm repair.血管内动脉瘤修复术对动脉瘤修复中体积-结果关系的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):624-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848465. Epub 2009 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Second Opinion for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者的手术二次诊断意见
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Mar 1;240(3):270-278. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001213. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
[Specialised treatment of colorectal cancer in certified cancer centres: Do patients really have to travel further?].[认证癌症中心对结直肠癌的专科治疗:患者真的需要前往更远的地方就医吗?]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Jul;85(7):657-666. doi: 10.1055/a-2055-9599. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
Private equity in ophthalmology and optometry: a time series analysis from 2012 to 2021.
眼科和视光学的私募股权投资:2012 年至 2021 年的时间序列分析。
Digit J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 31;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2022.10.004. eCollection 2023.
4
Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review.患者是否愿意接受更长的旅行时间来降低与手术相关的风险?一项系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 19;20(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8333-5.
5
Trends in elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair by practice setting in Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2016: a population-based time-series analysis.2003年至2016年加拿大安大略省按医疗机构类型划分的择期和破裂腹主动脉瘤修复趋势:基于人群的时间序列分析。
CMAJ Open. 2019 May 30;7(2):E379-E384. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180173. Print 2019 Apr-Jun.
6
Reorganising specialist cancer surgery for the twenty-first century: a mixed methods evaluation (RESPECT-21).为21世纪重组专科癌症手术:一项混合方法评估(RESPECT - 21)
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 25;11(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0520-5.
7
A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.患者选择外科医生所依据因素的系统评价
World J Surg. 2016 Jan;40(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3246-7.
8
Rehospitalization to primary versus different facilities following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.腹主动脉瘤修复术后再次住院至原医疗机构与至不同医疗机构的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jun;59(6):1502-10, 1510.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Jan 31.