Suppr超能文献

开颅术后的疼痛治疗:(具体手术相关的)证据在哪里?一项定性系统评价。

Pain treatment after craniotomy: where is the (procedure-specific) evidence? A qualitative systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia 4231, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital (FBM), Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;28(12):821-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a0255.

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Pain following craniotomy has been demonstrated to be frequent and moderate-to-severe in nature. In recent years, the focus on the challenges in treatment of postoperative pain following craniotomy has increased. Fear of using opioids because of their wide array of side-effects has led to the search for alternative analgesic options. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate current evidence about analgesic therapy following craniotomy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed database, Embase, Cochrane library, Google scholar and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) with pain or supplemental postoperative analgesic consumption as an endpoint were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 34 RCTs were identified, and nine RCTs were included in the final analysis, with a total of 519 patients (251 control vs. 268 active treatment). Four treatment modalities - scalp infiltration (five RCTs), nerve scalp block (two RCTs), parecoxib (one RCT) and patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (one RCT) - were evaluated. Scalp infiltration with local anaesthetic may provide adequate analgesia in the first few postoperative hours, and nerve scalp block may provide longer lasting analgesia for about 6 h. Morphine was found to reduce total analgesic rescue doses with no significant effect on nausea and no other side-effects. No significant evidence was found to support the use of parecoxib in the treatment of postcraniotomy pain.

CONCLUSION

No firm recommendations on analgesic therapy following craniotomy can be given because the number of well performed RCTs is limited and the study populations are very small. However, evidence on scalp infiltration suggests an analgesic effect in the first few postoperative hours. There is an urgent need for well performed RCTs on pain therapy following craniotomy.

摘要

背景和目的

开颅术后疼痛已被证实较为常见且程度为中重度。近年来,人们越来越关注开颅术后疼痛治疗的挑战。由于阿片类药物副作用广泛,人们对使用阿片类药物产生了恐惧,从而促使人们寻求替代的镇痛选择。本系统评价的目的是评估开颅术后镇痛的现有证据。

资料来源

PubMed 数据库、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Google Scholar 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature。

纳入标准

以疼痛或补充术后镇痛消耗为终点的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验(RCT)被纳入分析。

结果

共确定了 34 项 RCT,最终有 9 项 RCT 纳入了最终分析,共纳入 519 名患者(251 名对照组和 268 名活性治疗组)。评估了 4 种治疗方式——头皮浸润(5 项 RCT)、头皮神经阻滞(2 项 RCT)、帕瑞昔布(1 项 RCT)和吗啡患者自控镇痛(1 项 RCT)。局部麻醉剂头皮浸润可能在术后最初几个小时提供足够的镇痛,头皮神经阻滞可能提供长达 6 小时的持续镇痛。吗啡可减少总镇痛解救剂量,但对恶心无显著影响,也无其他副作用。没有确凿的证据支持使用帕瑞昔布治疗开颅术后疼痛。

结论

由于进行良好的 RCT 数量有限且研究人群非常小,因此无法对开颅术后的镇痛治疗提出明确建议。然而,头皮浸润的证据表明在术后最初几个小时内有镇痛作用。迫切需要进行开颅术后疼痛治疗的良好 RCT。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验