Unità Operative di Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Garibaldi Nesima e Ferrarotto, Catania, Italy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec;106(12):2112-20. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.341. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
Transient elastography (TE) is adequate for a diagnosis of cirrhosis, but its accuracy for milder stages of fibrosis is much less satisfactory. The objective of this study was to compare the performance and the discordance rate of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) and TE with liver biopsy in a cohort of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients.
One hundred thirty-nine consecutive patients with CHC were enrolled in two tertiary centers, and evaluated for histological (Metavir score) and biochemical features. All patients underwent TE and ARFI.
TE was unreliable in nine patients (6.5%), while in no cases (0%) were ARFI invalid measurements recorded (P=0.029). By area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the best cutoff values for TE and ARFI for significant fibrosis (≥F2) were ≥6.5 kPa (AUROC: 0.78) and ≥1.3 m/s (AUROC: 0.86), respectively. For severe fibrosis (F3-F4), these cutoff values were 8.8 kPa (AUROC: 0.83) for TE and 1.7 m/s (AUROC: 0.94) for ARFI. For cirrhosis, TE had its best cutoff at ≥11 kPa (AUROC: 0.80) and ARFI at ≥2.0 m/s (AUROC: 0.89). By pairwise comparison of AUROC, ARFI was significantly more accurate than TE for a diagnosis of significant and severe fibrosis (P=0.024 and P=0.002, respectively), while this difference was only marginal for cirrhosis (P=0.09). By partial AUROC analysis, ARFI performance results significantly higher for all three stages of fibrosis. The average concordance rates of TE and ARFI vs. liver biopsy were 45.4 and 54.7%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, ARFI was not associated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT), body mass index, Metavir grade, and liver steatosis, while TE was significantly correlated with the ALT value (P=0.027).
In a cohort of patients with CHC, ARFI imaging was more accurate than TE for the non-invasive staging of both significant and severe classes of liver fibrosis.
瞬时弹性成像(TE)足以用于诊断肝硬化,但对于更轻度纤维化阶段的准确性则差得多。本研究的目的是比较声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)和 TE 与肝活检在慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者中的表现和不一致率。
在两个三级中心纳入 139 例连续 CHC 患者,并进行组织学(Metavir 评分)和生化特征评估。所有患者均接受 TE 和 ARFI 检查。
TE 在 9 例患者(6.5%)中不可靠,而在 ARFI 中未记录到无效测量值(0%)(P=0.029)。通过接受者操作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积,TE 用于显著纤维化(≥F2)的最佳截断值为≥6.5kPa(AUROC:0.78)和 ARFI 为≥1.3m/s(AUROC:0.86)。对于严重纤维化(F3-F4),这些截断值分别为 TE 的 8.8kPa(AUROC:0.83)和 ARFI 的 1.7m/s(AUROC:0.94)。对于肝硬化,TE 的最佳截断值为≥11kPa(AUROC:0.80),ARFI 的最佳截断值为≥2.0m/s(AUROC:0.89)。通过 AUROC 的两两比较,ARFI 在诊断显著和严重纤维化方面明显优于 TE(P=0.024 和 P=0.002),而对于肝硬化,这种差异仅为边缘(P=0.09)。通过部分 AUROC 分析,ARFI 在所有三个纤维化阶段的表现均显著更高。TE 和 ARFI 与肝活检的平均一致性率分别为 45.4%和 54.7%。通过多变量分析,ARFI 与丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、体重指数、Metavir 分级和肝脂肪变性无关,而 TE 与 ALT 值显著相关(P=0.027)。
在 CHC 患者队列中,ARFI 成像对于显著和严重程度的肝纤维化分期的非侵入性评估均优于 TE。