Departments of Radiology/Neuroradiology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Sigmund Freud Str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2012 Jun;22(2):141-7. doi: 10.1007/s00062-011-0099-9. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
The aim of the study was to examine the effects of mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire stent in patients with thromboembolic occlusions of the intracranial carotid artery bifurcation (carotid T) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) and to compare the results with a historical cohort treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis using urokinase.
The time intervals from stroke onset to treatment, recanalization rates, occlusion sites, recanalization times and functional outcomes on the modified Rankin scale at 3 months in 25 patients treated with the Solitaire stent between 2010 and 2011 were evaluated. The data were compared with those of a historical cohort of 62 patients treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis between 1992 and 2001.
A total of 15 out of 25 (60%) patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy and 25 out of 62 (40%) treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis achieved a modified Rankin score of ≤2 (p = 0.07). Occlusion sites, intervals from stroke onset to treatment and rates of parenchymal hematomas, 3 out of 25 (12%) versus 8 out of 62 (13%), were similar in both cohorts while the recanalization rate was significantly higher, 22 out of 25 (88%) versus 33 of 62 (53%), in the mechanical thrombectomy group (p ≤ 0.01).
The data show that mechanical thrombectomy is superior to local intraarterial thrombolysis with respect to the recanalization rate in patients with thrombeoembolic carotid T or MCA occlusions.
本研究旨在探讨应用 Solitaire 支架机械取栓治疗颅内颈内动脉分叉部(颈动脉 T 部)或大脑中动脉(MCA)血栓栓塞性闭塞患者的效果,并与 1992 年至 2001 年期间接受局部动脉内尿激酶溶栓治疗的历史对照队列进行比较。
对 2010 年至 2011 年间应用 Solitaire 支架治疗的 25 例患者的发病至治疗时间间隔、再通率、闭塞部位、再通时间以及 3 个月时改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)的功能结局进行评估。并将这些数据与 1992 年至 2001 年期间接受局部动脉内溶栓治疗的 62 例历史对照队列的数据进行比较。
在接受机械取栓治疗的 25 例患者中,有 15 例(60%)患者的 mRS 评分为 ≤2,而在接受局部动脉内溶栓治疗的 62 例患者中,有 25 例(40%)患者的 mRS 评分为 ≤2(p = 0.07)。两组患者的闭塞部位、发病至治疗时间间隔以及实质血肿发生率(3 例,12%;8 例,13%)相似,而机械取栓组的再通率明显更高(22 例,88%;33 例,53%)(p ≤ 0.01)。
数据表明,在血栓栓塞性颈动脉 T 部或 MCA 闭塞患者中,与局部动脉内溶栓治疗相比,机械取栓治疗在再通率方面更具优势。