Ozdemir O, Bussière M, Leung A, Gulka I, Lee D, Chan R, Spence J D, Pelz D
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences, University Campus, London, Ontario, Canada. ozcan_99@yahoo
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep;29(8):1596-600. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1163. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
Cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion with middle cerebral artery (MCA) embolic occlusion is associated with a low rate of recanalization and poor outcome after intravenous thrombolysis. Prompt revascularization is required to prevent disabling stroke. We report our experience on acute ischemic stroke patients with tandem ICA or MCA occlusions treated with microcathether navigation and intra-arterial thrombolysis by use of collateral pathways including the posterior or anterior communicating arteries, or both pathways.
We retrospectively identified 8 patients with proximal ICA occlusion associated with MCA embolic occlusions treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis (IA rtPA). Access to the occluded MCA was obtained via catheter navigation through intact collateral pathways, including posterior communicating (PcomA) or anterior communicating (AcomA) arteries, without passing a microcathether through the acutely occluded ICA. We assessed clinical outcomes using modified Rankin scale (mRS) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
Eight patients with a mean age of 57 +/- 4 years and median NIHSS of 14 were identified. Mean time from stroke onset to intra-arterial thrombolysis was 292 +/- 44 minutes. The MCA was revascularized completely in 5 of the 8 patients via collateral intra-arterial rtPA administration. All of the patients had a favorable outcome defined as a mRS of < or =2 or more at 1 and 3 months' follow-up after thrombolytic therapy. One patient had an asymptomatic petechial hemorrhage.
In this small number of patients with tandem occlusions of the ICA and MCA, intra-arterial thrombolysis and recanalization of the MCA by use of collateral pathways to bypass the occluded ICA is a safe and efficacious therapeutic option.
颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞合并大脑中动脉(MCA)栓塞性闭塞与静脉溶栓后再通率低及预后不良相关。需要迅速进行血管再通以预防致残性卒中。我们报告了对急性缺血性卒中患者采用微导管导航及经包括后交通动脉或前交通动脉或两者在内的侧支途径进行动脉内溶栓治疗串联性ICA或MCA闭塞的经验。
我们回顾性确定了8例近端ICA闭塞合并MCA栓塞性闭塞并接受动脉内溶栓(IA rtPA)治疗的患者。通过完整的侧支途径(包括后交通动脉(PcomA)或前交通动脉(AcomA))进行导管导航来进入闭塞的MCA,而不使微导管穿过急性闭塞的ICA。我们使用改良Rankin量表(mRS)和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评估临床结局。
确定了8例平均年龄为57±4岁且NIHSS中位数为14的患者。从卒中发作到动脉内溶栓的平均时间为292±44分钟。8例患者中有5例通过侧支动脉内rtPA给药使MCA完全再通。所有患者在溶栓治疗后1个月和3个月的随访中均获得了良好结局,定义为mRS≤2或更高。1例患者出现无症状点状出血。
在这少数串联性ICA和MCA闭塞的患者中,通过侧支途径绕过闭塞的ICA进行动脉内溶栓及MCA再通是一种安全有效的治疗选择。