• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架置入术后冠状动脉血运重建不完全对长期死亡率的影响。

Impact of incomplete revascularization on long-term mortality after coronary stenting.

机构信息

Penn State Hershey College of Medicine, 600 Centerview Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;4(5):413-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963058. Epub 2011 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963058
PMID:21972405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3197764/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of incomplete revascularization (IR) on adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention remains inconclusive, and few studies have examined mortality during follow-ups longer than 5 years. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that IR is associated with higher risk of long-term (8-year) mortality after stenting for multivessel coronary disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 13 016 patients with multivessel disease who had undergone stenting procedures with bare metal stents in 1999 to 2000 were identified in the New York State's Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System. A logistic regression model was fit to predict the probability of achieving complete revascularization (CR) in these patients using baseline risk factors; then, the CR patients were matched to the IR patients with similar likelihoods of achieving CR. Each patient's vital status was followed through 2007 using the National Death Index, and the difference in long-term mortality between IR and CR was compared. It was found that CR was achieved in 29.2% (3803) of the patients. For the 3803 pair-matched patients, the respective 8-year survival rates were 80.8% and 78.5% for CR and IR (P=0.04), respectively. The risk of death was marginally significantly higher for IR (hazard ratio=1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.26, P=0.04). The 95% bootstrap confidence interval for the hazard ratio was 0.98 to 1.32.

CONCLUSIONS

IR may be associated with higher risk of long-term mortality after stenting with BMS in patients with multivessel disease. More prospective studies are needed to further test this association.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不完全血运重建(IR)对不良结局的影响仍不确定,很少有研究在随访时间超过 5 年的情况下检查死亡率。本研究旨在检验以下假设:在多支血管疾病患者中,与支架置入后接受 BMS 治疗相比,IR 与长期(8 年)死亡率升高相关。

方法和结果

在纽约州经皮冠状动脉介入治疗报告系统中,共确定了 1999 年至 2000 年期间 13016 例接受裸金属支架置入术治疗多支血管疾病的患者。使用基线风险因素拟合逻辑回归模型,预测这些患者实现完全血运重建(CR)的概率;然后,将 CR 患者与具有相似实现 CR 可能性的 IR 患者相匹配。通过国家死亡指数,在 2007 年之前对每位患者的生存状况进行随访,并比较 IR 与 CR 之间的长期死亡率差异。结果发现,29.2%(3803 例)的患者实现了 CR。在 3803 对配对患者中,CR 和 IR 的 8 年生存率分别为 80.8%和 78.5%(P=0.04)。IR 的死亡风险略高(风险比=1.12;95%置信区间,1.01-1.26,P=0.04)。风险比的 95%自举置信区间为 0.98 至 1.32。

结论

在多支血管疾病患者中,与接受 BMS 治疗相比,IR 可能与支架置入后长期死亡率升高相关。需要更多的前瞻性研究来进一步检验这种关联。

相似文献

1
Impact of incomplete revascularization on long-term mortality after coronary stenting.支架置入术后冠状动脉血运重建不完全对长期死亡率的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;4(5):413-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963058. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
2
Incomplete revascularization is associated with greater risk of long-term mortality after stenting in the era of first generation drug-eluting stents.在第一代药物洗脱支架时代,支架置入术后不完全血运重建与长期死亡率增加相关。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 15;112(6):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
3
Impact of completeness of percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization on long-term outcomes in the stent era.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗血管重建完整性对支架时代长期预后的影响。
Circulation. 2006 May 23;113(20):2406-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.612267. Epub 2006 May 15.
4
Incomplete revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents: impact on adverse outcomes.药物洗脱支架时代的不完全血运重建:对不良结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan;2(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.08.021.
5
Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies.多支血管病变患者完全血运重建与不完全血运重建的结局比较:随机临床试验和观察性研究中 89883 例患者的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):1421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
6
Comparison of Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery According to the Completeness of Revascularization in Severe Coronary Artery Disease: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, and BEST Trials.比较严重冠状动脉疾病患者完全血运重建患者中支架置入术与旁路移植术的疗效:SYNTAX、PRECOMBAT 和 BEST 临床试验的患者水平汇总分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 24;10(14):1415-1424. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.037.
7
Long-Term Outcome of Incomplete Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry).在 SCAAR(瑞典冠状动脉造影和血管成形术登记处)中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不完全血运重建的长期结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 8;9(3):207-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.034.
8
Long-term outcomes of complete versus incomplete revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary disease.多支血管病变患者药物洗脱支架置入术后完全与不完全血运重建的长期结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):343-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24799. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
9
Association of incomplete revascularization with long-term survival after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后不完全血运重建与长期生存的关系。
J Surg Res. 2013 Nov;185(1):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
10
Comparison of the Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease After Angiographic Complete and Incomplete Revascularization With Drug-Eluting Stents.经药物洗脱支架血管成形术治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病患者的急性和长期结局的比较:完全与不完全血运重建。
Circ J. 2018 Mar 23;82(4):992-998. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0812. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Flow Ratio or Angiography for the Assessment of Non-culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Protocol of the Randomized Trial QUOMODO.定量血流比或血管造影术用于评估急性冠状动脉综合征中的非罪犯病变:随机试验QUOMODO方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 4;9:815434. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.815434. eCollection 2022.
2
Angiographic Complete versus Clinical Selective Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Heart Failure Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease.多支血管病变心力衰竭患者血管造影完全与临床选择性不完全经皮血运重建的比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 27;2020:9506124. doi: 10.1155/2020/9506124. eCollection 2020.
3
Quantitative flow ratio-guided residual functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.定量血流比指导下的残余功能性 SYNTAX 评分在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的风险评估。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jul 20;17(4):e287-e293. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00369.
4
Association of Coronary Vessel Characteristics With Outcome in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Incomplete Revascularization.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗未完全血运重建患者的冠状动脉特征与结局的相关性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;3(2):123-130. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4787.
5
Complete revascularization determined by myocardial perfusion imaging could improve the outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease, compared with incomplete revascularization and no revascularization.心肌灌注成像指导下的完全血运重建可改善稳定性冠心病患者的预后,优于不完全血运重建和无血运重建。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Jun;26(3):944-953. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-1145-z. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
6
Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多支血管病变ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中分期与一次性完全血运重建的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169406. eCollection 2017.
7
Impact of Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多支冠状动脉疾病患者经皮血管重建不完全的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Dec 16;5(12):e004598. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004598.
8
Multivessel revascularisation versus infarct-related artery only revascularisation during the index primary PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: a meta-analysis.多支血管血运重建与梗死相关动脉血运重建在 STEMI 伴多支血管病变患者的直接 PCI 中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Neth Heart J. 2015 Apr;23(4):224-31. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0674-9.
9
Long-term outcomes of complete versus incomplete revascularization for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in drug-eluting stent era.药物洗脱支架时代多支冠状动脉疾病合并左心室收缩功能障碍患者完全血运重建与不完全血运重建的长期预后
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Nov;29(11):1501-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.11.1501. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
Incomplete revascularization is associated with greater risk of long-term mortality after stenting in the era of first generation drug-eluting stents.在第一代药物洗脱支架时代,支架置入术后不完全血运重建与长期死亡率增加相关。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 15;112(6):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Complete revascularization in patients undergoing multivessel PCI is an independent predictor of improved long-term survival.多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的完全血运重建是长期生存改善的独立预测因子。
J Interv Cardiol. 2010 Jun;23(3):256-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00556.x.
2
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影的比较:多支血管评估血流储备分数与血管造影(FAME)研究的 2 年随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28.
3
Drug-eluting stents: a study of international practice.药物洗脱支架:一项国际实践研究。
Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):576-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.033.
4
Incomplete revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents: impact on adverse outcomes.药物洗脱支架时代的不完全血运重建:对不良结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan;2(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.08.021.
5
Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations.随机临床试验与观察性研究:评估各自优势与局限性的指南
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun;1(3):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.01.008.
6
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.血流储备分数与血管造影术在指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
7
Complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.接受药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支血管病变患者的完全血运重建与不完全血运重建
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct 1;72(4):448-56. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21666.
8
Some old and some new statistical tools for outcomes research.一些用于结果研究的新旧统计工具。
Circulation. 2008 Aug 19;118(8):872-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.766907.
9
Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.2004年至2006年心血管外科文献中的倾向评分匹配:系统评价与改进建议
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;134(5):1128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.07.021.
10
Importance of complete revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死患者实现完全血运重建的重要性。
Am Heart J. 2007 Feb;153(2):304-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.10.033.