Some old and some new statistical tools for outcomes research.
作者信息
Normand Sharon-Lise T
机构信息
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
出版信息
Circulation. 2008 Aug 19;118(8):872-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.766907.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Some old and some new statistical tools for outcomes research.一些用于结果研究的新旧统计工具。
Circulation. 2008 Aug 19;118(8):872-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.766907.
2
Using Instrumental Variables to Address Bias From Unobserved Confounders.使用工具变量解决未观察到的混杂因素导致的偏差。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 4;321(21):2124-2125. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5646.
3
Statistical reporting for current and future readers.为当前及未来的读者提供统计报告。
Anesthesiology. 2007 Aug;107(2):193-4. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000271870.76451.c9.
4
Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.己所不欲，勿施于人；所欲而书，即为读者之愿。
J Physiol. 2012 Dec 15;590(24):6251-4. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.248278.
5
The Importance of Predefined Rules and Prespecified Statistical Analyses: Do Not Abandon Significance.预定义规则和预先指定的统计分析的重要性：不要摒弃显著性。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 4;321(21):2067-2068. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4582.
6
P-values and reproductive health: what can clinical researchers learn from the American Statistical Association?P值与生殖健康：临床研究人员能从美国统计协会中学到什么？
Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2406-2410. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew192. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
7
Instrumental variable methods in clinical research.临床研究中的工具变量方法。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Oct;150(4):779-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.056. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
8
Problem with p values: why p values do not tell you if your treatment is likely to work.P值的问题：为何P值无法告诉你治疗是否可能有效。
Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jan;96(1131):1-3. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137079. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
9
The statistician will see you now….统计学家现在要见你……
Diabet Med. 2021 Apr;38(4):e14437. doi: 10.1111/dme.14437. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Good analytical practice: statistics and handling data in biomedical science: A primer and directions for authors. Part 2: analysis of data from three or more groups, and instructions for authors.良好分析实践：生物医学科学中的统计学与数据处理：作者指南及方向。第2部分：三组或更多组数据的分析及作者须知
Br J Biomed Sci. 2009;66(1):42-6. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2009.11730243.
引用本文的文献
1
Associations of Traditionally Determined Left Ventricular Mass Indices and Hemodynamic and Non-Hemodynamic Components of Cardiac Remodeling with Diastolic and Systolic Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病患者传统测定的左心室质量指数与心脏重塑的血流动力学和非血流动力学成分与舒张和收缩功能的相关性
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 22;12(13):4211. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134211.
2
Performance of a novel risk model for deep sternal wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting.新型冠状动脉旁路移植术后深部胸骨伤口感染风险模型的表现。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 7;12(1):15177. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19473-1.
3
Aortic Stiffness and Pulsatile Pressures as Potential Mediators of Chronic Kidney Disease Induced Impaired Diastolic Function.主动脉僵硬度和脉压作为慢性肾脏病所致舒张功能障碍的潜在介质
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2022 Feb 15;15:27-40. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S346074. eCollection 2022.
4
Prediction of operative mortality for patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures without established risk scores.预测未建立风险评分的心脏手术患者的手术死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr;165(4):1449-1459.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.重新思考临床试验中的复合终点：来自患者和试验人员的见解。
Circulation. 2014 Oct 7;130(15):1254-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006588. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
6
Predicting hematoma expansion after primary intracerebral hemorrhage.预测原发性脑出血后的血肿扩大。
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Feb;71(2):158-64. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5433.
7
Characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving new and replacement implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the NCDR.接受新型和更换型植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的特征及结局：国家心血管数据注册研究结果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):488-97. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000054. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
8
External adjustment sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding: an application to coronary stent outcomes, Pennsylvania 2004-2008.未测量混杂的外部调整敏感性分析：宾夕法尼亚州 2004-2008 年冠状动脉支架治疗结果的应用。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):1191-214. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12013. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
9
Epidemiologic and statistical methods for comparative effectiveness research.比较疗效研究的流行病学和统计学方法。
Heart Fail Clin. 2013 Jan;9(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
10
Impact of incomplete revascularization on long-term mortality after coronary stenting.支架置入术后冠状动脉血运重建不完全对长期死亡率的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;4(5):413-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963058. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
本文引用的文献
1
Correlated bivariate continuous and binary outcomes: issues and applications.相关双变量连续和二元结局：问题与应用
Stat Med. 2009 Jun 15;28(13):1753-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.3588.
2
A comparison of methods for combining quality and efficiency performance measures: profiling the value of hospital care following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后综合质量与效率绩效指标的方法比较：剖析医院护理价值
Stat Med. 2008 Apr 30;27(9):1351-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.3082.
3
Influence of inpatient service specialty on care processes and outcomes for patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.住院服务专科对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者护理过程及结局的影响。
Circulation. 2007 Sep 4;116(10):1153-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.697003. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
4
Much ado about nothing: A comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models.无事生非：缺失数据方法与拟合不完全数据回归模型软件的比较
Am Stat. 2007 Feb;61(1):79-90. doi: 10.1198/000313007X172556.
5
Analyzing multiple informant data from an evaluation of the health disparities collaboratives.分析来自健康差异协作评估的多渠道信息数据。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):146-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00597.x.
6
Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.存在治疗选择偏倚时观察性研究的分析：使用倾向评分和工具变量法分析侵入性心脏管理对急性心肌梗死生存率的影响
JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):278-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.278.
7
An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.一种适用于根据急性心肌梗死患者30天死亡率剖析医院绩效的行政索赔模型。
Circulation. 2006 Apr 4;113(13):1683-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.611186. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
8
All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance.全或无测量提高了性能标准。
JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1168-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1168.
9
Methods used to streamline the CAHPS Hospital Survey.用于简化CAHPS医院调查的方法。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2057-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00478.x.
10
Optimal timing of intervention in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) Registry.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的最佳干预时机：来自CRUSADE（不稳定型心绞痛患者能否通过早期实施ACC/AHA指南进行快速风险分层以抑制不良结局）注册研究的见解
Circulation. 2005 Nov 15;112(20):3049-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.582346. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
Zotero 插件