Ullrich Helen, Olschewski Maximilian, Belhadj Khelifa-Anis, Münzel Thomas, Gori Tommaso
Department of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Standort RheinMain, Mainz, Germany.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 4;9:815434. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.815434. eCollection 2022.
Approximately 50% of the patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have additional stenotic lesions in non-infarct-related coronary arteries. The decision whether these stenoses require further treatment is routinely based on angiography alone. The quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a simple non-invasive method that may help quantify the functional significance of these intermediate coronary artery lesions. The aim of our single-center, randomized superiority trial is to test the impact and efficacy of QFR, as compared to angiography, in the treatment of patients with ACS with multivessel coronary artery disease. Primary goal of the study is to investigate 1. The impact of QFR on the proportion of patients receiving PCI vs. conservative therapy and 2. whether QFR improves angina pectoris and overall cardiovascular outcomes.
After treatment of the culprit lesion(s), a total of 200 consecutive ACS patients will be randomized 1:1 to angiography- vs. QFR-guided revascularization of non-culprit stenoses. Patients and clinicians responsible are blinded to the randomization group. The primary functional endpoint is defined as the proportion of patients assigned to medical treatment in the two groups. The primary clinical endpoint is a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization and significant angina at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in the SAQ subgroups, and clinical events at 3- and 12-month follow-up.
This study is designed to investigate whether QFR-based decision-making is associated with a decrease in angina and an improved prognosis in patients with multivessel disease.
ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04808310).
在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,约50%在非梗死相关冠状动脉中存在额外的狭窄病变。这些狭窄是否需要进一步治疗的决定通常仅基于血管造影。定量血流比(QFR)是一种简单的非侵入性方法,可能有助于量化这些中等冠状动脉病变的功能意义。我们的单中心随机优效性试验的目的是测试与血管造影相比,QFR在治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的ACS患者中的影响和疗效。该研究的主要目标是调查:1. QFR对接受PCI与保守治疗的患者比例的影响;2. QFR是否能改善心绞痛和总体心血管结局。
在处理罪犯病变后,总共200例连续的ACS患者将按1:1随机分为血管造影引导组和QFR引导组,对非罪犯狭窄进行血运重建。患者和负责的临床医生对随机分组情况不知情。主要功能终点定义为两组中分配接受药物治疗的患者比例。主要临床终点是12个月时死亡、非致命性心肌梗死、血运重建和严重心绞痛的复合终点。次要终点包括西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)亚组的变化,以及3个月和12个月随访时的临床事件。
本研究旨在调查基于QFR的决策是否与多支血管疾病患者心绞痛的减少和预后的改善相关。
ClinicalTrials.gov注册库(NCT04808310)。