Division of Hemostasis and Thrombosis, Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Dec;9(12):2416-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04525.x.
Overt proteinuria is a strong risk factor for thromboembolism, owing to changes in the levels of various coagulation proteins and urinary antithrombin loss. The described coagulation disturbances in these patients are based on outdated studies conducted primarily in the 1970s and 1980s. Whether these coagulation disturbances resolve with antiproteinuric therapy has yet to be studied.
A total of 32 patients with overt proteinuria (median, 3.7 g day(-1) ; interquartile range, 1.5-5.6) were enrolled in this intervention crossover trial designed to assess optimal antiproteinuric therapy with sodium restriction, losartan, and diuretics. Levels of various procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins, and parameters of two thrombin generation assays (calibrated automated thrombogram [CAT] and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2) were compared between the placebo period and the maximum antiproteinuric treatment period. As a secondary analysis, coagulation measurements of the placebo period in these patients were compared with those of 32 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls.
Median proteinuria was significantly lower during the maximum treatment period (median, 0.9 g day(-1) ; interquartile range, 0.6-1.4; P < 0.001) than during the placebo period. Similarly, levels of various liver-synthesized procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins, activated protein C resistance and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 levels were significantly lower during the maximum treatment period than during the placebo period. However, von Willebrand factor and factor VIII levels were similar. On the basis of the higher levels of procoagulant proteins (fibrinogen, FV, FVIII, and von Willebrand factor) and both thrombin generation assays, patients were substantially more prothrombotic than healthy controls (P < 0.004).
Antiproteinuric therapy ameliorates the prothrombotic state. Proteinuric patients are in a more prothrombotic state than healthy controls.
大量蛋白尿是血栓栓塞的一个强危险因素,这归因于各种凝血蛋白水平的改变和尿抗凝血酶的丢失。这些患者中描述的凝血紊乱基于上世纪 70 年代和 80 年代进行的旧研究。这些患者的蛋白尿经抗蛋白尿治疗后凝血紊乱是否得到改善仍有待研究。
这项干预性交叉试验共纳入 32 例大量蛋白尿患者(中位数 3.7 g/d;四分位距 1.5-5.6),旨在评估钠限制、氯沙坦和利尿剂的最佳抗蛋白尿治疗效果。在安慰剂期和最大抗蛋白尿治疗期之间比较了各种促凝和抗凝蛋白水平,以及两种凝血酶生成试验(校准自动化血栓图[CAT]和凝血酶原片段 1+2)的参数。作为二次分析,将这些患者安慰剂期的凝血测量值与 32 名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者进行了比较。
最大治疗期的蛋白尿中位数显著低于安慰剂期(中位数 0.9 g/d;四分位距 0.6-1.4;P<0.001)。同样,在最大治疗期,各种肝合成的促凝和抗凝蛋白、活化蛋白 C 抵抗和凝血酶原片段 1+2水平也显著低于安慰剂期。然而,血管性血友病因子和因子 VIII 水平相似。基于更高的促凝蛋白(纤维蛋白原、FV、FVIII 和血管性血友病因子)和两种凝血酶生成试验,患者的血栓形成倾向明显高于健康对照组(P<0.004)。
抗蛋白尿治疗可改善血栓形成倾向。蛋白尿患者的血栓形成倾向比健康对照组更明显。