• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Office and ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide vs. hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy in obese, hypertensive patients.肥胖高血压患者中缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪联合治疗与以氢氯噻嗪为基础的治疗的降压效果:诊室血压和动态血压。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Oct;13(10):731-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00499.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
2
Ambulatory blood pressure response to triple therapy with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB), calcium-channel blocker (CCB), and HCTZ versus dual therapy with an ARB and HCTZ.与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)的双联疗法相比,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)三联疗法对动态血压的影响。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:701-8. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S25743. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
3
Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study.力滴定缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平/氢氯噻嗪对2期高血压患者动态血压的影响:EVALUATE研究
Blood Press Monit. 2009 Jun;14(3):112-20. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832a9da7.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
5
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
6
Combination angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium channel blocker with HCTZ vs the maximal recommended dose of an ARB with HCTZ in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the exforge as compared to losartan treatment in stage 2 systolic hypertension (EXALT) study.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/钙通道阻滞剂与 HCTZ 的联合用药与 HCTZ 最大推荐剂量的 ARB 相比在 2 期高血压患者中的应用:依福地平与缬沙坦治疗 2 期收缩期高血压(EXALT)研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Aug;13(8):588-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00492.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
7
Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control.比较缬沙坦±氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平±氢氯噻嗪策略以最大程度控制血压的随机研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:883-92. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s8062. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
8
Triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide vs dual combination therapy with amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide for stage 2 hypertensive patients.氨氯地平、缬沙坦和氢氯噻嗪三联联合疗法与氨氯地平和氢氯噻嗪双联联合疗法治疗2级高血压患者的疗效比较
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Sep 7;6:821-7. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s11522.
9
Triple antihypertensive therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide: a randomized clinical trial.氨氯地平、缬沙坦和氢氯噻嗪三联降压治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Hypertension. 2009 Jul;54(1):32-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.131300. Epub 2009 May 26.
10
24-hour ambulatory blood-pressure effects of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide combinations compared with amlodipine in hypertensive patients at increased cardiovascular risk: a VAST sub-study.缬沙坦与氢氯噻嗪联合用药和氨氯地平对心血管风险增加的高血压患者24小时动态血压的影响:一项VAST子研究
Blood Press Monit. 2005 Apr;10(2):85-91. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200504000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Weight Loss Medications in the Treatment of Obesity and Hypertension.肥胖与高血压的治疗:减肥药物
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019 Feb 12;21(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0915-1.
2
Hypertension in Obesity and the Impact of Weight Loss.肥胖中的高血压及体重减轻的影响
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Aug 24;19(10):98. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0912-4.
3
Lercanidipine/enalapril combination in the management of obesity-related hypertension.乐卡地平/依那普利联合用药治疗肥胖相关性高血压
Integr Blood Press Control. 2016 Apr 26;9:69-77. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S92779. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring compared with clinic and home blood pressure measures in evaluating moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy.对于接受血管紧张素受体阻滞剂单药治疗未达控制的患者,动态血压监测与诊室和家庭血压测量相比,在评估氨氯地平/缬沙坦对高血压进行中度与强化治疗中的作用。
Blood Press Monit. 2011 Apr;16(2):87-95. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328344c713.
2
Aliskiren alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with the lower ranges of stage 2 hypertension: The ACQUIRE randomized double-blind study.阿利吉仑单药治疗或与氢氯噻嗪联合治疗 2 期高血压低危患者的效果:ACQUIRE 随机双盲研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010 Dec;12(12):917-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00378.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
3
Angiotensin receptor blocker/diuretic combination preserves insulin responses in obese hypertensives.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/利尿剂联合治疗可改善肥胖高血压患者的胰岛素反应。
J Hypertens. 2010 Aug;28(8):1761-9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833af380.
4
Impact of abdominal obesity on incidence of adverse metabolic effects associated with antihypertensive medications.腹型肥胖对与降压药物相关的不良代谢影响发生率的影响。
Hypertension. 2010 Jan;55(1):61-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.139592. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
5
Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control.比较缬沙坦±氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平±氢氯噻嗪策略以最大程度控制血压的随机研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:883-92. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s8062. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
6
Factors affecting blood pressure variability: lessons learned from two systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials.影响血压变异性的因素:从两项随机对照试验的系统评价中获得的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2009 May 22;4(5):e5673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005673.
7
Triple antihypertensive therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide: a randomized clinical trial.氨氯地平、缬沙坦和氢氯噻嗪三联降压治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Hypertension. 2009 Jul;54(1):32-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.131300. Epub 2009 May 26.
8
ALLHAT findings revisited in the context of subsequent analyses, other trials, and meta-analyses.在后续分析、其他试验及荟萃分析的背景下重新审视抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)的结果。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 11;169(9):832-42. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.60.
9
Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study.力滴定缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平/氢氯噻嗪对2期高血压患者动态血压的影响:EVALUATE研究
Blood Press Monit. 2009 Jun;14(3):112-20. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832a9da7.
10
Mechanistic insights into diuretic-induced insulin resistance.利尿剂诱发胰岛素抵抗的机制性见解。
Hypertension. 2008 Dec;52(6):1009-11. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120923. Epub 2008 Nov 3.

肥胖高血压患者中缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪联合治疗与以氢氯噻嗪为基础的治疗的降压效果:诊室血压和动态血压。

Office and ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide vs. hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy in obese, hypertensive patients.

机构信息

University of Miami-Nephrology, Miami, FL 33125-1624, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Oct;13(10):731-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00499.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00499.x
PMID:21974760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8108811/
Abstract

The authors evaluated the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs. amlodipine/HCTZ in a 16-week, double-blind, randomized, forced-titration study and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) substudy involving centrally obese hypertensive patients 40 years and older. Patients were started on valsartan/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg or HCTZ 12.5 mg monotherapy, force-titrated at week 4 to valsartan/HCTZ 320/25 mg and HCTZ 25 mg, respectively. The HCTZ group initiated amlodipine 5 mg at week 8 and 10 mg at week 12. A subset of patients had 24-hour ABPM at baseline and weeks 8 and 16. At week 16 in the intent-to-treat population (n=401), valsartan/HCTZ and amlodipine/HCTZ lowered office systolic BP (-30.6 vs. -28.3 mm Hg; P=.14). In the ABPM subgroup (n=111), valsartan/HCTZ was more effective than amlodipine/HCTZ in reducing 24-hour systolic BP (-20.6 vs. -14.5 mm Hg; P=.011). In obese hypertensive patients, valsartan/HCTZ reduced office BP similar to amlodipine/HCTZ but lowered 24-hour systolic BP more.

摘要

作者评估了缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)联合治疗与氨氯地平/HCTZ 联合治疗在一项为期 16 周、双盲、随机、强制滴定研究中的降压效果,以及一项涉及中心性肥胖高血压患者(年龄≥40 岁)的动态血压监测(ABPM)子研究。患者起始缬沙坦/HCTZ 160/12.5mg 或 HCTZ 12.5mg 单药治疗,第 4 周时分别强制滴定至缬沙坦/HCTZ 320/25mg 和 HCTZ 25mg,HCTZ 组在第 8 周和第 12 周起始氨氯地平 5mg 和 10mg。部分患者在基线、第 8 周和第 16 周时进行了 24 小时 ABPM。在意向治疗人群(n=401)中,第 16 周时缬沙坦/HCTZ 和氨氯地平/HCTZ 分别降低了诊室收缩压(-30.6 与-28.3mmHg;P=.14)。在 ABPM 亚组(n=111)中,缬沙坦/HCTZ 比氨氯地平/HCTZ 更有效地降低了 24 小时收缩压(-20.6 与-14.5mmHg;P=.011)。在肥胖高血压患者中,缬沙坦/HCTZ 降低诊室血压与氨氯地平/HCTZ 相似,但降低 24 小时收缩压更明显。