Constella Group, Durham, NC, USA.
Epidemiol Health. 2011;33:e2011008. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2011008. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
Formative research can serve as a means of obtaining important information for designing an epidemiologic study, but descriptions of this approach in the epidemiologic literature are lacking. The objective of this paper is to describe the use of three formative research techniques in designing a survey of home care and hospice nurses.
We conducted two focus groups, seven key informant interviews, and approximately fifteen hours of direct observation among home care and hospice nurses recruited by word of mouth in North Carolina in 2006.
We used information obtained from the formative research to decide which survey design would likely be most successful with this population (mail survey, as opposed to Internet survey or in-person interviews), which measure to use for the denominator of the blood exposure incidence rates (number of visits, as opposed to patient-time), and which items and response options to include in the questionnaire, as well as to identify specific survey techniques that would likely increase the response rate (emphasizing the regional focus of the study; sending the questionnaire to the home address).
When particular information for planning a study is unavailable from the literature or the investigator's experience, formative research can be an effective means of obtaining that information.
形成性研究可作为获取设计流行病学研究重要信息的一种手段,但此类方法在流行病学文献中的描述却很少见。本文的目的在于描述在设计一项家庭护理和临终关怀护士调查时,使用三种形成性研究技术的情况。
2006 年,我们通过口头招募,在北卡罗来纳州进行了两次焦点小组讨论、七次关键知情人访谈和大约 15 小时的直接观察。
我们利用形成性研究获得的信息,来决定哪种调查设计最有可能成功应用于这一人群(邮寄调查,而非网络调查或面对面访谈)、用于计算血液暴露发生率分母的测量方法(就诊次数,而非患者时间)、调查问卷中应包含哪些项目和应答选项,以及确定哪些具体调查技术可能会提高应答率(强调研究的区域重点;将问卷寄至家庭住址)。
当特定的研究计划信息无法从文献或研究者经验中获得时,形成性研究可以是获取这些信息的有效手段。