• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索澳大利亚精神卫生服务中隔离使用的模式。

Exploring patterns of seclusion use in Australian mental health services.

机构信息

Institute for Health and Social Science Research and School of Nursing and Midwifery, CQUniversity Australia, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton, 4702, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Oct;25(5):e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.apnu.2011.04.001
PMID:21978809
Abstract

Seclusion has remained a common practice in mental health services. In Australia, recent mental health policy has reflected a desire to reduce (and, if possible, eliminate) the use of seclusion. The collection and analysis of data on the use of seclusion have been identified as an important component of the success of reduction initiatives. A cross-sectional design was used in the collection of inpatient unit data on seclusions that occurred in 11 mental health services in Australia over a 6-month period. During this time, there were 4,337 episodes of care. One or more seclusions occurred in 6.8% of episodes of care, with consumers being secluded, on average, 2.32 times and with 44% of them having been secluded more than once. The average length of the seclusions was 2 hours 52 minutes, with 51.4% of seclusions being less than 2 hours. These rates were lower than those reported in previous research studies. The practice of seclusion occurred more commonly on the first 2 days following admission, on weekdays than weekends, and between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and midnight. An understanding of seclusion data can provide fundamental information from which strategies to reduce seclusion can be developed.

摘要

在精神卫生服务中,隔离一直是一种常见的做法。在澳大利亚,最近的精神卫生政策反映了减少(如果可能的话,消除)隔离的愿望。收集和分析关于隔离使用的数据已被确定为减少措施成功的重要组成部分。在收集澳大利亚 11 个精神卫生服务机构在 6 个月期间发生的住院病人隔离数据时,采用了横断面设计。在此期间,有 4337 个护理疗程。在 6.8%的护理疗程中发生了一次或多次隔离,平均每个疗程隔离 2.32 次,其中 44%的人被隔离超过一次。隔离的平均时间为 2 小时 52 分钟,其中 51.4%的隔离时间少于 2 小时。这些比率低于以前的研究报告中所报告的比率。隔离的做法更常见于入院后的头 2 天,在工作日比周末更常见,并且在上午 9 点到午夜之间。对隔离数据的了解可以提供基本信息,从而制定减少隔离的策略。

相似文献

1
Exploring patterns of seclusion use in Australian mental health services.探索澳大利亚精神卫生服务中隔离使用的模式。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Oct;25(5):e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
2
Seclusion reduction in a forensic mental health setting.减少法医精神卫生机构的隔离。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Mar;19(2):97-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01753.x. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
3
Effectiveness of six core strategies based on trauma informed care in reducing seclusions and restraints at a child and adolescent psychiatric hospital.基于创伤知情护理的六种核心策略在减少儿童青少年精神病医院的隔离和约束措施方面的有效性。
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Feb;24(1):11-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00262.x.
4
When reduction strategies are put in place and mental health consumers are still secluded: an analysis of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics.当实施减少隔离的策略后精神卫生消费者仍被隔离时:临床及社会人口学特征分析
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Dec;23(6):506-12. doi: 10.1111/inm.12078. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
5
From numbers to understanding: the impact of demographic factors on seclusion rates.从数字到理解:人口因素对隔离率的影响。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Jun;19(3):169-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00670.x.
6
Seclusion and its context in acute inpatient psychiatric care.急性住院精神病护理中的隔离及其背景。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Aug;36(8):459-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.035402. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
7
Attitudes to the use of seclusion: has contemporary mental health policy made a difference?对使用隔离的态度:当代心理健康政策是否产生了影响?
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Nov;19(21-22):3208-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03286.x.
8
Seclusion of children and adolescents: psychopathological and family factors.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2005 Mar;14(1):37-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0979.2005.00353.x.
9
[Determinants of seclusion in a psychiatric institution: a naturalistic and exploratory study].[精神病院隔离的决定因素:一项自然主义探索性研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2012;54(3):211-21.
10
Decreasing the use of restraint and seclusion among psychiatric inpatients.减少精神科住院患者的约束和隔离使用。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2007 Sep;13(5):308-17. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000290669.10107.ba.

引用本文的文献

1
Seclusion and mechanical restraint in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: an increased use in mental health settings.2019冠状病毒病大流行后隔离与机械约束措施:在精神卫生环境中的使用增加
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 4;15:1428599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1428599. eCollection 2024.
2
Identifying Direct Coercion in a High Risk Subgroup of Offender Patients With Schizophrenia Machine Learning Algorithms.识别精神分裂症罪犯患者高危亚组中的直接强制行为 机器学习算法
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 13;11:415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00415. eCollection 2020.
3
Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression.
机器学习:与二元逻辑回归相比,一种识别强制风险因素的方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 12;9:258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258. eCollection 2018.
4
One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective.隔离的一年发病率和患病率:荷兰研究结果的国际视角
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;50(12):1857-69. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1094-2. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
5
Investigation of Seclusion in one of the Psychiatric Wards in Razi Teaching Hospital of Tabriz.大不里士拉齐教学医院某精神科病房隔离情况调查
J Caring Sci. 2014 Dec 1;3(4):297-300. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2014.032. eCollection 2014 Dec.