Hotzy Florian, Theodoridou Anastasia, Hoff Paul, Schneeberger Andres R, Seifritz Erich, Olbrich Sebastian, Jäger Matthias
Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Psychiatrische Dienste Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 12;9:258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258. eCollection 2018.
Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coercive measures. In a sample of involuntarily hospitalized patients ( = 393) at the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, we analyzed risk factors for the experience of coercion ( = 170 patients) using chi-square tests and Mann Whitney U tests. We trained machine learning algorithms [logistic regression, Supported Vector Machine (SVM), and decision trees] with these risk factors and tested obtained models for their accuracy via five-fold cross validation. To verify the results we compared them to binary logistic regression. In a model with 8 risk-factors which were available at admission, the SVM algorithm identified 102 out of 170 patients, which had experienced coercion and 174 out of 223 patients without coercion (69% accuracy with 60% sensitivity and 78% specificity, AUC 0.74). In a model with 18 risk-factors, available after discharge, the logistic regression algorithm identified 121 out of 170 with and 176 out of 223 without coercion (75% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 79% specificity, AUC 0.82). Incorporating both clinical and demographic variables can help to estimate the risk of experiencing coercion for psychiatric patients. This study could show that trained machine learning algorithms are comparable to binary logistic regression and can reach a good or even excellent area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of the outcome coercion/no coercion when cross validation is used. Due to the better generalizability machine learning is a promising approach for further studies, especially when more variables are analyzed. More detailed knowledge about individual risk factors may help to prevent the occurrence of situations involving coercion.
尽管在精神病学领域存在关于强制手段负面影响的知识,但在临床常规中其发生率仍然很高。本研究旨在确定风险因素,并测试机器学习算法在预测遭受强制手段风险方面的准确性。在苏黎世大学精神病医院的非自愿住院患者样本(n = 393)中,我们使用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼U检验分析了遭受强制(n = 170例患者)的风险因素。我们使用这些风险因素训练机器学习算法[逻辑回归、支持向量机(SVM)和决策树],并通过五折交叉验证测试所得模型的准确性。为了验证结果,我们将其与二元逻辑回归进行比较。在一个入院时可用的包含8个风险因素的模型中,SVM算法识别出170例遭受强制的患者中的102例,以及223例未遭受强制的患者中的174例(准确率69%,敏感性60%,特异性78%,AUC 0.74)。在一个出院后可用的包含18个风险因素的模型中,逻辑回归算法识别出170例遭受强制的患者中的121例,以及223例未遭受强制的患者中的176例(准确率75%,敏感性71%,特异性79%,AUC 0.82)。纳入临床和人口统计学变量有助于估计精神病患者遭受强制的风险。本研究表明,经过训练的机器学习算法与二元逻辑回归相当,在使用交叉验证预测强制/非强制结果时,能够达到良好甚至优秀的曲线下面积(AUC)。由于具有更好的可推广性,机器学习是进一步研究的一种有前途的方法,尤其是在分析更多变量时。关于个体风险因素的更详细知识可能有助于预防涉及强制情况的发生。