Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025739. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
Although a large body of literature exists for the environmental risk factors for La Crosse virus (LACV) transmission, the demographic and socioeconomic risk factors for developing LACV infection have not been investigated. Therefore, this study investigated the demographic and socioeconomic risk factors for LACV infection in West Virginia from 2003 to 2007, using two forward stepwise discriminant analyses. The discriminant analyses were used to evaluate a number of demographic and socioeconomic factors for their ability to predict: 1) those census tracts with at least one reported case of LACV infection versus those census tracts with no reported cases of LACV infection and 2) to evaluate significantly high-risk clusters for LACV infection versus significantly low-risk clusters for LACV infection. In the first model, a high school education diploma or a general education diploma or less and a lower housing densitywere found to be predictive of those census tracts with at least one case of LACV infection. A high school or a general education diploma or less, lower housing density, and housing built in 1969 and earlier were all found to be predictive of those census tracts displaying high-risk clusters versus census tracts displaying low-risk clusters in the second model. The cluster discriminant analysis was found to be more predictive than the census tract discriminant analysis as indicated by the Eigenvalues, canonical correlation, and grouping accuracy. The results of this study indicate that socioeconomically disadvantaged populations are at the highest risk for LACV infection and should be a focus of LACV infection prevention efforts.
尽管有大量文献研究了拉科罗纳病毒(LACV)传播的环境风险因素,但尚未调查人口统计学和社会经济风险因素与 LACV 感染的关系。因此,本研究使用两种向前逐步判别分析,调查了 2003 年至 2007 年期间西弗吉尼亚州的 LACV 感染的人口统计学和社会经济风险因素。判别分析用于评估一些人口统计学和社会经济因素,以预测:1)至少有一例 LACV 感染报告的普查区与没有报告 LACV 感染病例的普查区;2)评估 LACV 感染的高风险聚类与 LACV 感染的低风险聚类。在第一个模型中,发现高中或普通教育文凭或以下以及较低的住房密度是预测至少有一例 LACV 感染报告的普查区的因素。在第二个模型中,发现高中或普通教育文凭或以下、较低的住房密度以及建于 1969 年及更早的住房,是预测显示高风险聚类的普查区与显示低风险聚类的普查区的因素。正如特征值、典型相关性和分组准确性所表明的那样,聚类判别分析比普查区判别分析更具预测性。本研究的结果表明,社会经济处于不利地位的人群感染 LACV 的风险最高,应成为 LACV 感染预防工作的重点。