Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Medical Faculty, Institute of Medical Psychology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Brain Stimul. 2011 Oct;4(4):175-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
Noninvasive repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) can improve visual field size in patients with optic nerve damage, but it is not known if this is of subjective relevance. We now assessed patient reported outcomes to determine the association between visual field changes and vision-related quality of life (QoL).
Patients having visual field impairments long after optic nerve damage (mean lesion age 5.5 years) were randomly assigned to a rtACS (n = 24) or sham stimulation group (n = 18). Visual fields and patient reported outcome measures (vision-related QoL: National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, NEI-VFQ and health-related QoL: Short Form Health Survey, SF-36) were collected before and after a 10-day treatment course with daily sessions of 20 to 40 minutes. The primary outcome measure was the percent change from baseline of detection ability (DA) in defective visual field sectors as defined by computer-based high resolution perimetry (HRP). Secondary outcome parameters included further HRP parameters as well as static and kinetic perimetry results. Changes in QoL measures were correlated with changes in primary and secondary outcome measures in both groups.
DA increase in the defective visual field was significantly larger after rtACS (41.1 ± 78.9%, M ± SD) than after sham stimulation (13.6 ± 26.3%), P < 0.05. While there was a significant increase of DA in the whole tested HRP visual field after rtACS (26.8 ± 76.7%, P < 0.05), DA in sham-stimulation patients remained largely unchanged (2.7 ± 20.2%, ns). Results of secondary outcome measures (static and kinetic perimetry) provided further evidence of rtACS efficacy. Improvements in NEI-VFQ subscale "general vision" were observed in both groups but were larger in the rtACS group (11.3 ± 13.5, Z = -3.21, P < 0.001) than in the sham group (4.2 ± 9.4, Z = -1.73, P < 0.05) with a significant difference between groups (Z = -1.71, P < 0.05). DA change and some NEI-VFQ domains were correlated (r = 0.29, P < 0.05), but no significant correlations were observed between DA and SF-36 results.
rtACS facilitates vision restoration after unilateral, long-term optic nerve lesion as assessed both by objective DA changes and improvements in some NEI-VFQ subscales. Both were positively but low correlated, which suggests that factors other than visual field size also contribute to improved vision-related QoL.
非侵入性重复经颅交流电刺激(rtACS)可改善视神经损伤患者的视野大小,但尚不清楚这是否具有主观相关性。我们现在评估了患者报告的结果,以确定视野变化与视觉相关生活质量(QoL)之间的关联。
患者在视神经损伤后很长时间(平均病变年龄为 5.5 年)出现视野缺损,被随机分配至 rtACS(n=24)或假刺激组(n=18)。在 10 天的治疗过程中,每天进行 20-40 分钟的治疗,在治疗前后收集了视野和患者报告的结果测量(视觉相关 QoL:国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷,NEI-VFQ 和健康相关 QoL:短格式健康调查,SF-36)。主要观察指标是计算机高分辨率视野检查(HRP)定义的缺陷视野区域检测能力(DA)的基线百分比变化。次要观察指标包括进一步的 HRP 参数以及静态和动态视野检查结果。两组患者的 QoL 指标变化与主要和次要观察指标的变化相关。
rtACS 后缺陷视野中的 DA 增加明显大于假刺激(41.1±78.9%,M±SD),P<0.05。虽然 rtACS 后整个测试 HRP 视野中的 DA 显著增加(26.8±76.7%,P<0.05),但假刺激患者的 DA 基本保持不变(2.7±20.2%,ns)。次要观察指标(静态和动态视野检查)的结果提供了 rtACS 疗效的进一步证据。两组患者的 NEI-VFQ 子量表“一般视力”均有改善,但 rtACS 组的改善更大(11.3±13.5,Z=-3.21,P<0.001),而假刺激组为 4.2±9.4,Z=-1.73,P<0.05),两组间有显著差异(Z=-1.71,P<0.05)。DA 变化与一些 NEI-VFQ 域相关(r=0.29,P<0.05),但 DA 与 SF-36 结果之间无显著相关性。
rtACS 可促进单侧长期视神经病变后的视力恢复,客观的 DA 变化和一些 NEI-VFQ 子量表的改善均可评估。两者均呈正相关,但相关性较低,这表明除了视野大小外,其他因素也有助于提高视觉相关的 QoL。