Suppr超能文献

医疗保健专业人员感知的电子信息交换的益处和问题:一项访谈研究。

Benefits and problems of electronic information exchange as perceived by health care professionals: an interview study.

机构信息

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P,O, Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 7;11:256. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-256.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various countries are currently implementing a national electronic patient record (n-EPR). Despite the assumed positive effects of n-EPRs, their overall adoption remains low and meets resistance from health care providers. This study aims to increase our understanding of health care providers' attitude towards the n-EPR, by investigating their perceptions of the benefits and problems of electronic information exchange in health care and the n-EPR in particular.

METHODS

The study was conducted in three Dutch health care settings: acute care, diabetes care, and ambulatory mental health care. Two health care organisations were included per setting. Between January and June 2010, interviews were conducted with 17 stakeholders working in these organisations. Relevant themes were deduced by means of thematic qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Health care providers perceived electronic information exchange to promote the efficiency and quality of care. The problems they perceived in electronic information exchange mainly concerned the confidentiality and safety of information exchange and the reliability and quality of patient data. Many problems perceived by health care providers did not specifically apply to the n-EPR, but to electronic information exchange in general.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the Dutch n-EPR has mainly followed a top-down approach, thereby neglecting the fact that the perceptions and preferences of its users (health care providers) need to be addressed in order to achieve successful implementation. The results of this study provide valuable suggestions about how to promote health care providers' willingness to adopt electronic information exchange, which can be useful for other countries currently implementing an n-EPR. Apart from providing information about the benefits and usefulness of electronic information exchange, efforts should be focused on minimising the problems as perceived by health care providers. The safety and confidentiality of electronic information exchange can be improved by developing tools to evaluate the legitimacy of access to electronic records, by increasing health care providers' awareness of the need to be careful when using patient data, and by measures to limit access to sensitive patient data. Improving health care providers' recording behaviour is important to improve the reliability and quality of electronically exchanged patient data.

摘要

背景

目前,各国正在实施国家电子病历(n-EPR)。尽管 n-EPR 具有积极影响,但整体采用率仍然较低,且受到医疗保健提供者的抵制。本研究旨在通过调查医疗保健中电子信息交换以及特别是 n-EPR 的收益和问题的感知,增加对医疗保健提供者对 n-EPR 的态度的理解。

方法

该研究在荷兰三个医疗保健环境中进行:急性护理、糖尿病护理和门诊精神保健。每个环境中都包含两个医疗保健组织。2010 年 1 月至 6 月期间,对在这些组织中工作的 17 名利益相关者进行了访谈。通过主题定性分析推断出相关主题。

结果

医疗保健提供者认为电子信息交换可提高护理效率和质量。他们感知到的电子信息交换中的问题主要涉及信息交换的保密性和安全性,以及患者数据的可靠性和质量。许多医疗保健提供者感知到的问题不仅适用于 n-EPR,而且适用于一般的电子信息交换。

结论

荷兰 n-EPR 的实施主要采用了自上而下的方法,从而忽略了其用户(医疗保健提供者)的看法和偏好需要得到解决,以实现成功实施。本研究的结果为促进医疗保健提供者采用电子信息交换的意愿提供了有价值的建议,这对于目前正在实施 n-EPR 的其他国家可能会有所帮助。除了提供电子信息交换的收益和有用性信息外,还应集中精力最小化医疗保健提供者感知到的问题。可以通过开发工具来评估访问电子记录的合法性、提高医疗保健提供者在使用患者数据时谨慎的意识以及采取措施限制对敏感患者数据的访问,来提高电子信息交换的安全性和保密性。改善医疗保健提供者的记录行为对于提高电子交换的患者数据的可靠性和质量很重要。

相似文献

7
Stakeholders perspectives and deployment strategies of health information exchange illustrated through an in-depth case study of Pakistan.
Inform Health Soc Care. 2020;45(2):130-150. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2019.1582053. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Multidisciplinary user experience of a newly implemented electronic patient record in Ireland: An exploratory qualitative study.
Int J Med Inform. 2024 May;185:105399. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105399. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Electronic health systems: challenges faced by hospital-based providers.
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2013 Jul-Sep;32(3):246-52. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e31829d76a4.
10

引用本文的文献

3
Acceptability of Health Information Exchange and Patient Portal Use in Depression Care Among Underrepresented Patients.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3947-3955. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07427-2. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
Saving Time for Patient Care by Optimizing Physician Note Templates: A Pilot Study.
Front Digit Health. 2022 Jan 13;3:772356. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.772356. eCollection 2021.
5
8
Possible Sources of Bias in Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data Use and Reuse.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 29;20(5):e185. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9134.
10
Physician "out of office" alert: does it work?
Curr Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(3):e176-e179. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3548. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):655-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090192.
3
The electronic locum record for general practitioners: outcome of an evaluation study in the Netherlands.
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Sep;79(9):623-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
4
Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jul;47(7):846-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.016.
6
Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness.
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Aug 25;10(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1030.
7
Costs and benefits of health information technology.
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr(132):1-71. doi: 10.23970/ahrqepcerta132.
9
Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care--an interactive sociotechnical analysis.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):542-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2384. Epub 2007 Jun 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验